http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7459
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-18 19:20 PST ---
Any word? This still exists with Mesa 6.5.2 and GCC 4.1.2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>>> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8961&action=view
>>>
>>> Thomas?
>> Are you just looking for someone to check in the patch, or
>> looking for someone to review/approve the patch?
>
> A review would be nice,
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-18 09:08 PST ---
I've checked in the last patch. Can this be closed now?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
On 3/18/07, Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All the Glean tests that check for specific rendering results already
> have an error margin.
>
> Can you be more specific about which tests are failing and how the error
> margin might need to be changed?
>
> -Brian
I previously replied (but for
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10328
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mesa3d- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> See the attached patch: In s_readpix.c, expect GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24
> (instead of 32) as internal format when the visual has 24 depth bits.
>
> Brian: Does this look right to you?
Yes. I've checked it in. Thanks.
-Brian
---
All the Glean tests that check for specific rendering results already
have an error margin.
Can you be more specific about which tests are failing and how the error
margin might need to be changed?
-Brian
Oliver McFadden wrote:
> I notice some failures with the example tests (R300) that seem t
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7205
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-18 08:48 PST ---
Upgraded to latest git code and it works. Sorry for the false alarm.
(In reply to comment #41)
> Are you using the very latest git code with my assorted fixes for zero
> wi
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10219
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-18 06:21 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=9211)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9211&action=view)
limitation for MIN_LOD in i965
Check the upper limit of min_lod in i9
See the attached patch: In s_readpix.c, expect GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24
(instead of 32) as internal format when the visual has 24 depth bits.
Brian: Does this look right to you?
~Nicolai
Fix: Assertion in read_depth_pixels
Fix an assertion in read_depth_pixels that assumes an InternalF
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10328
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|mesa3d-
|g
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10232
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
13 matches
Mail list logo