On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Ian Romanick
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brian Paul wrote:
>> Brian Paul wrote:
>>> Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
>>> master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
>>> kee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>> Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
>> master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
>> keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:22, Ian Romanick
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:10 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:10 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> In
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please report any problems found and we'll try to fix them ASAP.
-Brian
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
softwar
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20043
--- Comment #2 from Brian Paul 2009-02-10
15:01:35 PST ---
Could you possibly create a small glut test program? Perhaps modify
mesa/progs/tests/bufferobj.c?
Which driver are you using?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/u
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20043
--- Comment #1 from Johan Bilien 2009-02-10 14:53:09 PST ---
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb805a7f2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 0xb7c7f640 in raise () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7c81018 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20043
Summary: tnl/t_draw.c:203: bind_inputs: Assertion `inputs[i]-
>BufferObj->Pointer' failed.
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> BTW everyone, I'm planning on merging gallium-master-merge to master this
> afternoon.
>
> Then I'll merge in the latest gallium-0.2 changes to get those. (OR, should
> I merge gallium-0.2 into gallium-master-merge first? Git gurus?)
>
> gal
Sung W. Park wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently running Intel G35 (i965) hardware with Mesa 7.2 and I've
> noticed that sharedtex.c doesn't work.
>
> Apparently it has issues with validating textures from a shared context.
>
> Is this a known bug? Sorry if this has been discussed already.
>
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
>>>
>>> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
>>
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> In terms of the build system, we'll initially default to the non-gallium
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On 10 feb 2009, at 16.46, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>>> On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>> but is it p
On 10 feb 2009, at 16.46, Brian Paul wrote:
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and class
On 12:39 Tue 10 Feb , Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I think I'd prefer either building all or none of the drivers in each
> case, rather than trying to tweak things up or down driver by driver.
>
> Given Dave's preference for building both legacy + gallium drivers from
> the existing linux-dri-* tar
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
>>> On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic
> drivers from
> the s
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 05:56 -0800, Michal Krol wrote:
> Anything other than Size is better. I would have thought that Size
> would be misunderstood as total size in bytes, but here you have it.
> At least NrTokens will make people stop and think about its meaning.
> What about TotalNumTokens?
>
Anything other than Size is better. I would have thought that Size would be
misunderstood as total size in bytes, but here you have it. At least NrTokens
will make people stop and think about its meaning. What about TotalNumTokens?
I haven't been following gallium development for a while -- is g
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 05:41 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On 10 feb 2009, at 13.39, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> >> On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
>
On 10 feb 2009, at 13.39, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>> On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> but
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 11:24 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
> >
> > Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
> > master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
> > keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
> >
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
> >> On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and cl
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
>> On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic
drivers from
the same tree at the same time?
24 matches
Mail list logo
