Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC] reduce number of visuals exposed by Intel drivers

2010-02-08 Thread Allen Akin
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:52:32AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: | piglit isn't the problem. It's glean and an internal closed-source test | suite that are the problem. We don't have particular control over | either one. I certainly don't object if you need to modify glean. :-) | Remember the gold

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC] reduce number of visuals exposed by Intel drivers

2010-02-08 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pauli Nieminen wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:01:50 -0800, Ian Romanick >> wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> I'd like to remove a bunch of the visuals and fbco

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC] reduce number of visuals exposed by Intel drivers

2010-02-06 Thread Pauli Nieminen
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:01:50 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'd like to remove a bunch of the visuals and fbconfigs exposed by the >> Intel drivers.  There are several categories of visuals

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC] reduce number of visuals exposed by Intel drivers

2010-02-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:01:50 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'd like to remove a bunch of the visuals and fbconfigs exposed by the > Intel drivers. There are several categories of visuals that are likely > not useful to anyone. A couple of our t

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC] reduce number of visuals exposed by Intel drivers

2010-02-05 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'd like to remove a bunch of the visuals and fbconfigs exposed by the > Intel drivers.  There are several categories of visuals that are likely > not useful to anyone.  A couple of our test s