On 15.12.2009 18:02, michal wrote:
> Roland Scheidegger pisze:
>> On 15.12.2009 14:14, michal wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> Does the attached patch make sense to you?
>>>
>>> I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
>>> functions that are complete but are going to be a
Roland Scheidegger pisze:
> On 15.12.2009 14:14, michal wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Does the attached patch make sense to you?
>>
>> I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
>> functions that are complete but are going to be a bit more expensive to
>> call. Since they a
On 15.12.2009 14:14, michal wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Does the attached patch make sense to you?
>
> I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
> functions that are complete but are going to be a bit more expensive to
> call. Since they are used not very often in mesa state t
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 05:14 -0800, michal wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Does the attached patch make sense to you?
>
> I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
> functions that are complete but are going to be a bit more expensive to
> call. Since they are used not very often i
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 05:14 -0800, michal wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Does the attached patch make sense to you?
>
> I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
> functions that are complete but are going to be a bit more expensive to
> call. Since they are used not very often i
Guys,
Does the attached patch make sense to you?
I replaced the incomplete switch-cases with calls to u_format_access
functions that are complete but are going to be a bit more expensive to
call. Since they are used not very often in mesa state tracker, I
thought it's a good compromise.
Tha
