On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>> The patch looks good. But when I tried to make EGL_DRIVER and the default
>> driver also honor EGL_DRIVERS_PATH, it turned out that I need to overhaul
>> both
>> the existing code and your patch.
>> I've attached my version in this mail. It
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
Here is a version of the patch that uses EGL_DRIVERS_PATH and checks
for
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>>> Here is a version of the patch that uses EGL_DRIVERS_PATH and checks
>>> for setuid/setgid
>>> before using EGL_DRIVER or EGL_DRIVER
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>> Here is a version of the patch that uses EGL_DRIVERS_PATH and checks
>> for setuid/setgid
>> before using EGL_DRIVER or EGL_DRIVERS_PATH.
> The patch seems to be missing :)
Here is the miss
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
> Here is a version of the patch that uses EGL_DRIVERS_PATH and checks
> for setuid/setgid
> before using EGL_DRIVER or EGL_DRIVERS_PATH.
The patch seems to be missing :)
I want to avoid suffix matching somehow.
> I am not clear about the m
olv,
Here is a version of the patch that uses EGL_DRIVERS_PATH and checks
for setuid/setgid
before using EGL_DRIVER or EGL_DRIVERS_PATH.
>>> I want to avoid suffix matching somehow.
I am not clear about the motive for a less than exact check for the
library suffix in EGL_DRIVER.
Are you intere
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:35 AM, tom fogal wrote:
> Mike Stroyan writes:
>> The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side
>> effect of not looking in the directories specified by LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> or -rpath or ldconfig .
>
> This is silly. If you give dlopen a library name:
Mike Stroyan writes:
> The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side
> effect of not looking in the directories specified by LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> or -rpath or ldconfig .
This is silly. If you give dlopen a library name:
dlopen("libWhatever.so", flags);
then *it* will automa
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>>> The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side effect of
>>> not
>>> looking in the directories specified by LD_
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
>> The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side effect of
>> not
>> looking in the directories specified by LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -rpath or
>> ldconfig.
>> This patch change
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Mike Stroyan wrote:
> The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side effect of
> not
> looking in the directories specified by LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -rpath or ldconfig.
> This patch changes the search to first look in the directories listed in
> LD_
The changes to load EGL drivers by pattern matching had the side effect of not
looking in the directories specified by LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -rpath or ldconfig.
This patch changes the search to first look in the directories listed in
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. To do that it moves the possible addition of a p
12 matches
Mail list logo
