Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2021-01-04 Thread Eric Wong
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:31:39PM +, Eric Wong wrote: > > AFAIK, V2Writable always does the right thing on -purge/-edit; > > at least for WWW users(*). > > > > V2W does more work in rare cases when history gets rewritten, > > but doesn't track anything beyond

Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2021-01-04 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:31:39PM +, Eric Wong wrote: > AFAIK, V2Writable always does the right thing on -purge/-edit; > at least for WWW users(*). > > V2W does more work in rare cases when history gets rewritten, > but doesn't track anything beyond the latest indexed commit > hash. > > In

Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2020-12-28 Thread Eric Wong
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 06:28:08AM +, Eric Wong wrote: > > Eric Wong wrote: > > > > > > There's scripts/ssoma-replay which was v1-only and dependent on > > > ssoma. I've been meaning to convert into something that reads > > > NNTP so it's not locked into

Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2020-12-28 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 06:28:08AM +, Eric Wong wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: > > > > There's scripts/ssoma-replay which was v1-only and dependent on > > ssoma. I've been meaning to convert into something that reads > > NNTP so it's not locked into public-inbox. Maybe it could be > > part of

Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2020-12-21 Thread Eric Wong
Eric Wong wrote: > > There's scripts/ssoma-replay which was v1-only and dependent on > ssoma. I've been meaning to convert into something that reads > NNTP so it's not locked into public-inbox. Maybe it could be > part of `lei', too, for piping to arbitrary commands, dunno... Fwiw, so far

Re: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2020-12-21 Thread Eric Wong
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > Hello: > > One of our projects is looking at mailing list hosting and I was wondering if > I should steer them towards public-inbox + mlmmj as opposed to things like the > moribund googlegroups, groups.io, etc. > > I know meta uses mlmmj, but there don't appear to

public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?

2020-12-21 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
Hello: One of our projects is looking at mailing list hosting and I was wondering if I should steer them towards public-inbox + mlmmj as opposed to things like the moribund googlegroups, groups.io, etc. I know meta uses mlmmj, but there don't appear to be many docs on how things are organized