Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] broxton-m/KBOOTPARAM: Add videofb console back

> On Nov 8, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > > This re-enables the video framebuffer for displaying cosole output > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > --- > common/recipes-bsp/rmc/boards/broxton-m/KBOOTPARAM | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[meta-intel] [PATCH] conf/machine/intel-core*: Change WKS_FILE to systemd-bootdisk-uuid

Overriding systemd-bootdisk.wks unconditionally was against Yocto Project's compatibility requirements, so our version needed to be renamed. Change our conf files to use the renamed version. Signed-off-by: California Sullivan --- Note: Depends on Saul's renaming

[meta-intel] [PATCH][V2] linux-yocto_4.4: Add INTEL_MACHINE_SUBTYPE code

This adds some a couple of bb.utils.contains() checks for an INTEL_MACHINE_SUBSTPYE to pull the appropriate SRCREV and KBRACH to build an alternate kernel. Also adds support for Broxton-m/Joule device as an example. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- v1: did not work as expected

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] rmc: Limit them to x86 targets

On 11/9/16 9:19 AM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > Khem, > > I think it is appropriate to have this. > > BTW, what RMC is based on actually supports non-x86 arches but meta-intel > team haven’t verified non-x86 boards. It does not build for all of them e.g. aarch64, if someone needs it then they can

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] rmc: Limit them to x86 targets

Khem, I think it is appropriate to have this. BTW, what RMC is based on actually supports non-x86 arches but meta-intel team haven’t verified non-x86 boards. Thanks lot! > On Nov 8, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > Makes meta-intel behave well in multi-BSP scene >