Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-05-08 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
; >> To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > >> Cc: Philip Balister ; > >> meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org > >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to > >> u-boot > for > >> Zynq > >> > >>

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-05-04 Thread Nathan Rossi
..@lists.yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to >> u-boot for >> Zynq >> >> On 28 April 2017 at 01:36, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha >> > ma...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> >&

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-05-01 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
l 27, 2017 7:11 AM > >> To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > >> Cc: Philip Balister ; > >> meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org > >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: > >> Default to u-boot for Zynq > >> > >> On

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-28 Thread Nathan Rossi
On 28 April 2017 at 05:13, Philip Balister wrote: > On 04/27/2017 12:59 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> On 27-04-17 16:11, Nathan Rossi wrote: >> ... >>> Looking at the differences, ignoring the obvious zynqmp/microblaze >>> changes there are only a few features that are available in >>> u-boot-xlnx

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-27 Thread Philip Balister
On 04/27/2017 12:59 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > On 27-04-17 16:11, Nathan Rossi wrote: > ... >> Looking at the differences, ignoring the obvious zynqmp/microblaze >> changes there are only a few features that are available in >> u-boot-xlnx that are not in mainline: >> * partial bitstream loading

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-27 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 27-04-17 16:11, Nathan Rossi wrote: ... Looking at the differences, ignoring the obvious zynqmp/microblaze changes there are only a few features that are available in u-boot-xlnx that are not in mainline: * partial bitstream loading support * secure/encrypted bitstream loading support * su

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-27 Thread Nathan Rossi
; meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to >> u-boot for >> Zynq >> >> On 27 April 2017 at 08:21, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -Original Messa

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-27 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
> >> To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha ; Nathan Rossi > >> > >> Cc: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org > >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to > >> u-boot > for > >> Zynq > >> > >>

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-27 Thread Nathan Rossi
gt; Cc: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to >> u-boot for >> Zynq >> >> On 04/26/2017 03:06 PM, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -Original Message-

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Jean-Francois Dagenais
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 15:37, Philip Balister wrote: > > I'd be happiest if meta-xilinx used upstream u-boot and a bbappend to > add patches that are not upstream yet. This way we (the consumers) know > exactly what the delta is to upstream. Just for reference, you could also: git clone -o orig

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
6, 2017 10:54 AM > >> To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > >> Cc: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org > >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: > >> Default to u-boot for Zynq > >> > >> On 27 April 2017 at 02:41, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha &g

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Philip Balister
t; -Original Message- >>>> From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx- >>>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Rossi >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:57 AM >>>> To: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org >>>&

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
] On Behalf Of Nathan Rossi > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:57 AM > >> To: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org > >> Subject: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to > >> u-boot for Zynq > >> > >> Upstream U-Boot provide

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot > for Zynq > > Upstream U-Boot provides an almost complete environment for the majority of > Zynq > targets and specifically covers all the boot functionality required for the > boards in > the meta-xilinx layer. As such default to the mainlin

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Nathan Rossi
, 2017 4:57 AM >> To: meta-xil...@lists.yoctoproject.org >> Subject: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot >> for Zynq >> >> Upstream U-Boot provides an almost complete environment for the majority of >> Zynq >> targets and specifically cove

[meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Default to u-boot for Zynq

2017-04-26 Thread Nathan Rossi
Upstream U-Boot provides an almost complete environment for the majority of Zynq targets and specifically covers all the boot functionality required for the boards in the meta-xilinx layer. As such default to the mainline version of U-Boot. For users that require or prefer to use u-boot-xlnx this