On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Geoff Canyon wrote:
> on 9/19/00 10:41 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you clone a substack, the copy *is* a substack of the same main
> > stack. It's not possible in general to do what you want, though,
> > because that would require nested substacks (
on 9/19/00 10:41 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you clone a substack, the copy *is* a substack of the same main
> stack. It's not possible in general to do what you want, though,
> because that would require nested substacks (which is something
> MetaCard supported before the 1
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, David Bovill wrote:
> If you are doing anything fancy with cloning multiple windows it would be
> really nice to be able to have the new cloned stack behave as a sub-stack,
> and be able to use the main stacks scripts without a lot of fiddling (ie
> send) or using the stack (
on 9/19/00 2:02 AM, David Bovill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you are doing anything fancy with cloning multiple windows it would be
> really nice to be able to have the new cloned stack behave as a sub-stack,
> and be able to use the main stacks scripts without a lot of fiddling (ie
> send)
If you are doing anything fancy with cloning multiple windows it would be
really nice to be able to have the new cloned stack behave as a sub-stack,
and be able to use the main stacks scripts without a lot of fiddling (ie
send) or using the stack (which can interfere with the global environment.
