Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Scott Raney
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Recently, Scott Raney wrote: > > > Those old > > things that start with a drive name and are delimited with colons are > > obsolete MacOS 7/8/9 format paths. The way of the future is UNIX paths. > > The irony being, UNIX is a 30 yea

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/7/03 8:33 PM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote: > >> on 1/7/03 2:19 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> And ONLY Metacard developers, as far as I see, have headache with conversion of paths...at least if they work

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Scott Raney
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote: > on 1/7/03 2:19 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> And ONLY Metacard developers, as far as I see, have headache with conversion > >> of paths...at least if they work with Valentina. > > > > Correct. Which is fine because the number of

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/7/03 2:26 PM, Robert Brenstein at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> It does: what you're confused about is what "native" means. Those old >>> things that start with a drive name and are delimited with colons are >>> obsolete MacOS 7/8/9 format paths. The way of the future is UNIX paths. >> >

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/7/03 2:19 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Because only MetaCard allows access to, e.g., the file /etc/password > so that you can determine what users are configured on the current > system. You have to go and buy an external package to do this with > these other products, which

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-07 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/7/03 2:19 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> And ONLY Metacard developers, as far as I see, have headache with conversion >> of paths...at least if they work with Valentina. > > Correct. Which is fine because the number of them doing > Mac/Windows/UNIX work *without* having to w

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-06 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Scott Raney wrote: > Those old > things that start with a drive name and are delimited with colons are > obsolete MacOS 7/8/9 format paths. The way of the future is UNIX paths. The irony being, UNIX is a 30 year old operating system... :-) Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tact

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-06 Thread Scott Raney
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 Ruslan Zasukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then I still think that Okay, you can return UNIX paths on default., > But will be good for MC developers if you will give them built-in methods to > convert them into MAC and windows native paths. It's not a problem on Windows, you

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-05 Thread Robert Brenstein
Okay, I see that this will be never changed in MetaCard. So this is private headache of MetaCard developers. The point is that MC users do not think of them as Unix filepaths and it is not a headache the way you perceive it. Within MC, one simply does not worry about platform-specific paths the

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-05 Thread Robert Brenstein
But will be good for MC developers if you will give them built-in methods to convert them into MAC and windows native paths. The conversion function is quite trivial and needed only when opening databases with Valentina, so it is used only by a small fraction of MC users. Within MC, one always

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread andu
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 20:45:14 +0200 Ruslan Zasukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on 1/4/03 3:13 PM, andu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andu, But problem is that MC 2.4.2 on some incredible reason returns UNIX paths on OS X ? What is so incredible about mc

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/4/03 3:13 PM, andu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andu, >> But problem is that MC 2.4.2 on some incredible reason returns UNIX paths >> on OS X ? > > What is so incredible about mc returning unix path on OSX, isn't OSX UNIX? > Besides, this behavior is the same on al

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/4/03 8:23 PM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> But problem is that MC 2.4.2 on some incredible reason returns UNIX paths on >> OS X ? > > This is the correct behavior: There are large sections of the UNIX > file system that are not accessible using MacOS pat

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Scott Raney
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote: > on 12/28/02 4:37 AM, Peter McConachie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Process is: > > 1. Make test database (btn [New dBase]). Close & check with VApp. > > 2 Open (btn [Open ord.dBase]) and dump file of table(s). Close dBase > > 3. Open dBase, encry

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread andu
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:23:55 +0200 Ruslan Zasukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And Scott, again, I believe this is NOT correct, that MC 2.4.2 which is CARBON, returns UNIX paths. It must return MacOS paths from Choose dialog. I just remembered, the metacard example stack for Valen

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread andu
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:23:55 +0200 Ruslan Zasukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But problem is that MC 2.4.2 on some incredible reason returns UNIX paths on OS X ? What is so incredible about mc returning unix path on OSX, isn't OSX UNIX? Besides, this behav

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 12/28/02 4:37 AM, Peter McConachie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Process is: > 1. Make test database (btn [New dBase]). Close & check with VApp. > 2 Open (btn [Open ord.dBase]) and dump file of table(s). Close dBase > 3. Open dBase, encrypt structure & total data & close - all done by btn > [E

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 1/4/03 11:23 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Peter, > Hi Scott, > > > Peter, I have try to test your project using MC 2.4.2 Carbon. > I do not want use MC 2.4.3 Macho because bundles have great problems with > debugging. > > But problem is that MC 2.4.2 on some incredib

Re: Database Encryption

2003-01-04 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 12/28/02 4:37 AM, Peter McConachie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Process is: > 1. Make test database (btn [New dBase]). Close & check with VApp. > 2 Open (btn [Open ord.dBase]) and dump file of table(s). Close dBase > 3. Open dBase, encrypt structure & total data & close - all done by btn > [E