Xavier writes:
> The difference may be that any bit of script may be taken by yahoo for
> commercial exploitation for free and without recourse to legal action
> in case they would want to take it back.
Scott sez he doesn't care if it goes public domain. He could use it to make
something new if
Please respond to metacard
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: ^
Subject: Re: SourceForge vs Yahoo
Richard Gaskin wrote:
> MisterX wrote:
>
>
>>it's probably changed now but this was yahoo's agreement..
>>
>>By su
Richard Gaskin wrote:
MisterX wrote:
it's probably changed now but this was yahoo's agreement..
By submitting Content to any Yahoo property, you automatically grant, or
warrant that the owner of such Content has expressly granted, Yahoo the
royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive and
MisterX wrote:
it's probably changed now but this was yahoo's agreement..
By submitting Content to any Yahoo property, you automatically grant, or
warrant that the owner of such Content has expressly granted, Yahoo the
royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive and fully sublicensable
ri
bit there...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Brenstein
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 02:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SourceForge vs Yahoo
>
>
> There seems to be a split between going with Y
There seems to be a split between going with Yahoo or SourceForge for
development. I have been in a few yahoo groups as well as on
sourceforge for a while. Yahoo groups definitely get hacked once a
while, although spamming there is not such a big deal for me since I
get tons of spam anyway. Mor
