it of selling/fun. We have to
remember, and it is often difficult, that this is a hobby and it should be
fun and sometimes doing something different adds to the fun.
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Farmer" <[EMAIL PROT
Hello List and Steve,
I for one am very excited about your reverse auction. I remember getting
some great deals on some really rare specimens a few years ago and it was a
great deal of fun doing it.
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
- Original Message -
From
Hello Al and List,
Powellsville is a very incredible meteorite with some very rare red crystals
that Dirk Ross spoke about on the list a few years ago. To help with your
accounting I have a 268 gram slice.
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
- Original Message
m the list, kept from
being accepted by all and any within the 'world of meteorites' by
those who are truly a part of it, because there should be no place in
such a hobby for one who lies, cheats, or steals.
Especially when -we- have the power to make this such a safe place.
Or am I wrong?
Re
think that the list is as good a forum as any for
proving a dealer's innocence or guilt in a situation, whatever the
case may be, because this does have an effect on the rest of us,
collectors and dealers alike. I, for one, wouldn't want to deal with
a dishonest dealer, whatever the case ma
*Not "Seymchan," but rather "Shirokovsky."
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Jason Utas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Elton, All,
> Hardly; I just think it's stupid to rule any sample out completely
> without a lab analysis.
> There's no single fe
7;s page
is a fragment, and the stone on ebay appeared to be a complete,
ablated individual. I assume that ablation would sculpt such a
heterogeneous stone admirably.
Jason
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Mr EMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ha ha Funny... the Rorschach-Shroom Techinque of
this stone, this one has more olivine in it.
That said, it could also be an unusual piece of slag, and I don't feel
like betting $1k on such a strange piece from a questionable
location...if I had more money, I might think otherwise.
Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Michael Murr
, Gao, Ziz, Unclassified, Sikhotes
(some really crazy ones), a Millbillillie, etc.
I'll be getting more up as soon as possible, probably over the next
few months...photos of larger specimens to come.
Enjoy,
Jason
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
here, trying
to get sympathy out of people by tossing in little comments like that
just makes me (and I would think people in general) look at you in a
light even less favourable than before.
Jason
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 3:51 PM, E.P. Grondine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all -
>
&g
four feet of snow.
Good hunting?by the sound of it, not until early summer, at best...
Regards,
Jason
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Chris Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say, looking at the data which has been published (and some that has
> not), that it is rather
t this was as good as I saw while
browsing.
Regards,
Jason
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Michael Chamberlain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clouds finally broke, very impressive clear full eclipse!! What fun!!
>
> Mike
> San Francisco
>
>
> - Original Message -
Bob,
On the bottom of his message -
Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
The Asteroid Belt!
--->Chicagometeorites.net<---
Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999
Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites
...it does work.
Jason
On Feb 12, 2008 6:39 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hola Laurence, All,
Seems unlikely; here's a picture of the stone:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article93341.ece
Doesn't look very good...
Regards,
Jason
On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 PM, Laurence Garvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was listening to the London
r the past two billion years), they don't
contain as much iron as typical chondrites and thus feel lighter than
typical meteorites.
But keep in mind - if you pick up an earth basalt, they would be
approximately the same density.
Regards,
Jason
On Feb 11, 2008 10:18 AM, E.P. Grondine <[
Hola Pete, All,
It's a meteorite; it looks to be a piece of Allende or another CV3,
but it's certainly not an Aubrite, and is most likely not from
Australia (why would it be when it looks to be Allende...).
So...an expensive bit of Allende with a shiny tag.
Regards,
Jason
On Feb 5, 200
r a lot of
those "Campo crystals" from Hans or another dealer who might have them
for cheaps; those, at least, would be real meteoric iron, and not just
oxide.
Or what about Sikhote shrapnel? That tends to be fairly cheap...
Best of Luck,
Jason
On Feb 4, 2008 10:36 PM, Bob Loeffler <[
at - it's a but much for
an ordinary chondrite...
Regards,
Jason
On Jan 28, 2008 11:04 AM, tracy latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This seller is based in Thailand. There are a bunch of good sellers
> operating out of Thailand, the gem capital of the world (at least for the
Hola Dave, All,
If you're making accurate labels, you might add 36kg to the tkw of
Tata (listed at 113 kg) - and make that two pieces found, as opposed
to one.
Kem Kem...I have no idea.
Regards,
Jason
On 26 Jan 2008 16:41:59 UT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David and List,
&g
Hello List,
I wanted to inform everyone that I have a new email address, so in the
future please send emails to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason Phillips
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
telephone: 217-832-4505
__
http
my hands or
b) pictures of a cut surface.
Jason
On Jan 23, 2008 12:05 PM, Eric Wichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I've got an Unclassified NWA that looks different than any other
> material I have in my collection. This 11 gram piece is very
> different than the
Hello List and Matthias,
I also thought that was a unique sentence, and I wonder if by "caught" it
meant that he was trying to steal the specimen. And if so why they sent him
home with a 107 kg piece and not to jail?
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
Hola All,
This was as close as I could get:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.meteoritearticles.com/chatroom.html
But the java programs don't seem to initiate correctly - at least, not for me.
Anyone else have any luck?
Regards,
Jason
On Jan 13, 2008 3:03 PM, dean bessey <[EMAIL P
www.rocksfromheaven.com - Thanks, Jason
Alamogordo: A rare slice of this 1938 find. It weighs 59.8 grams and comes
with the original American Meteorite Laboratory specimen label and has
painted numbers (77.63). The price on this extremely rare and historic
offering is $550.
Allende: This CV3 material
r he finds a
meteorite), it would stand to reason that he has found at least a few
paired meteorites, whether or not they are listed as such in the
catalogue.
Regards,
Jason
On Jan 9, 2008 7:01 PM, Peter A Shugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm the newbie, so please expl
E
Much of the area isn't imaged in good-enough quality to make for
worthwhile looking (at least in my free version of Google Earth), but
I've yet to try Worldwind...
Regards,
Jason
On Jan 9, 2008 6:39 PM, ensoramanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyo
n 'immature' - messages (there's a
reason no one is standing up and agreeing with you on any point you've
so far put forth, in case you might not have noticed this *fact*), I
probably will reply, seeing as we've left the arena of scientific
discussion and you've now successf
and
as such, I'm of the opinion that ideas should be thrown around - with
the general acceptance that such ideas are nothing more than theory
and are in no way to be called 'facts.' Because saying that would be
*wrong.*
I love how you refer to me in the third-person as well...I
call that being obnoxious.
Jason
On Dec 24, 2007 6:25 PM, Bob WALKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Listoids
>
> over here in oz we say:
>
> - a six pack short of a carton; or
> - some kangaros loose in the top paddock
>
>
> Meaning, what exactly?
>
> On
ll, I believe that many people have
something of a misconception based on biased 'find'/'found fall'
statistics.
There is also no known (as far as I know) reason to suggest that they
would be transported any less effectively when encased in ice/snow
than stones, though maybe yo
Meaning, what exactly?
On Dec 24, 2007 6:01 PM, Peter A Shugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sterling,
> Is it just me? Or is jason about two tacos and a burrito short of a
> combination plate?
> Pete
> __
> http://www.meteorit
ted, they alone
would constitute nearly one percent, to say nothing of the countless
irons that I have never seen or heard of.
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 24, 2007 4:46 PM, Sterling K. Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Jason, List,
>
> > I would dispute this claim [NWA depletion]
>
nd statistics should be rather more correct,
rendering this 'Saharan clearing of irons,' although possible, much
less influential with regard to their percentage of total finds.
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 24, 2007 3:12 PM, Sterling K. Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
>
ing that I feel need to be addressed further; they say enough on
their own.
I can go on, but I won't. Reply if you will; I know that everyone
else on here is with me and awaits your reply, if not with a smile at
what you'll say, then with a smile for no other reason than that they
won'
E.P., All,
> >To be perfectly frank, I've had enough of you, but I
> >do like getting the last word in, so here you go.
>
> Why do I have this feeling that this will not be the
> last word we hear from Jason?
Probably because we've not seen the last of you eith
E.P.
To be perfectly frank, I've had enough of you, but I do like getting
the last word in, so here you go.
> "If you stopped lying - and maybe started obeying the
> "laws of physics, scientific method, not to mention
> " basic logic, we might get somewhere.
>
&g
ch factors as angle of incidence,
> direction of travel, velocity of impactor, and/or type
> of impactor may inferred from circumstantial traces
> in a recent, well-preserved crater, if such traces are
> present. Usually this only happens in "small" craters,
> like the Arizona
o explain them fully, and, to be frank, I see no point in
wasting the time.
> >Because you're misunderstanding just about everything
> >I say?
>
> No, see my comment on my communication skills, above.
> It's for a different reason.
Well, evidently I haven't been able to
27;s exactly what happened to some of our fellow
> human beings in the recent past.
Well, probably, though we have no real proof of their having been
blasted to death *anywhere.*
> So, Jason, you wrote:
>
> >Right, but seeing as the effects from the event of
> >which we speak
hat I've never seen and never will.
> They had all been through de-glaciations before, so it wasn't
> that. Either "something" happened or Man the Mass Murderer is
> responsible. (A ridiculous theory; when game is scarce, y
nless one knows the approximate age of all lunar craters,
there's just no point of using it as a comparison for the number of
impacts that was occurring ~50k years ago, as we simply don't know
what the rate was.
...Am I making sense?
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 17, 2007 10:05 AM, <[EMAIL
Sterling, E.P., All,
> For the record, I like my peppered mammoth
> with lemon butter...
Thick-cut, salt and pepper.
> Jason, think about Tunguska. A 25 megaton airburst
> that left no crater, no pits, not even the tiniest, no
> material remains whatsoever, no isotopic trace
de here at
> the meteorite list was the one about sparks from
> welding. But then that hypothesis was shot down by the
> observed bone healing, and the sample from Siberia,
> so...
Well they're not spheroids, so...eh.
Jason
> E.P. Grondine
> Man and Impact in the Americas
e of your ~30,000 year old impactites anywhere
- not on the ground, under water, or anywhere else.
I'm inclined to believe that your crater shares the same fate.
It's not hiding...if it did exist, we would have found it...we haven't
found it...it doesn't exist.
Jason
> goo
w of any craters that
are confirmed to have been formed through the penetration of an
ice-sheet, as I don't think that current methods of dating are that
precise, but maybe I'm wrong...
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 15, 2007 4:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry
> Be carefu
f years old, and yet
we haven't found this < 100,000 year old monster of a hole in the
ground. Such a crater would be a sore thumb, with impactite strewn
about for hundreds of miles, not to mention the hole itself,
undoubtedly little eroded since its fairly recent formation.
Where did you s
our above the site of impact, no other
way. Spherules weren't moving quickly or anything like that - they
condensed, and fell primarily downwind of the crater, at, I would
assume, relatively low velocity and temperature - not quickly enough
or hot enough to penetrate bone, I'm sure.
Regards
ng
at anything Tunguska-like and big enough to initiate climate change.
Any thoughts? You discounted my last post by saying that I shouldn't
criticize without coming up with my own theory.
Why not discount what I say instead of how I said it? ^ is taking the
easy way out, and I think that my poi
egree
when they touched ground, and they weren't moving any more quickly
than terminal velocity.
I think this is just a case of ignorance: of physics, meteorites, etc.
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 13, 2007 12:41 PM, tracy latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I also agree. A
features seen on tusks), as well as
at least one larger impact (to generate the necessary crater/climate
change, etc), this is simply a load of rubbish.
\
To be frank, this looks like it was cooked up by someone who doesn't
know anything about entry or impact mechanics, never mind the physical
Hello All,
Unsure if this article has already been posted, but it hasn't arrived
in my inbox yet, so here goes.
Article text below; see link for the picture.
Jason
---
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7128000.stm
Meteorite dates lunar volcanoes
Volcanoes were active on the M
s are lightly
magnetic, but in general, they tend to be magnetic as well.
Almost all meteorites are magnetic...I don't know where you heard
otherwise, but...yeah.
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 2, 2007 4:43 PM, Michael Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
> I've read somewher
ell, it has chondrules, but, again, I would not, by any means, settle
to calling it an EL3 - or an Aubrite. Structurally, it is neither.
Anomalous, anyone?
Regards,
Jason
On Dec 1, 2007 12:07 AM, Adam Hupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I never called it a type three if you r
ly very few
chondrules in general.
It's neither a typical Aubrite, nor your average type three; it has
characteristics of both, and thus picking one side on the basis of
ignoring the other characteristics of the stone is clearly wrong.
Regards,
Jason
On Nov 30, 2007 1:35 PM, Adam Hupe &
call it anomalous, call it a primitive achondrite, or
make up a new name, but for the sake of meteoritics, call it something
that fits the rock itself; don't call it an Aubrite or a type three
chondrite because it is *neither* of these, at least as these terms
are currently defined by science.
sible, but is highly (very, very, very highly) unlikely.
Jason
On Nov 29, 2007 10:21 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Sterling:
>
> I have not had a chance to read the articles in general, but if Venus is
> still losing its water, and we are talking about this happening with
nce to any such even in a bulletin,
nor the catalog, etc, etc. I've looked into it about as far as
possible and haven't had any luck. Unfortunately, there's a stone and
a newspaper clipping that say that something did, in fact,
happen...near Queenstown, perhaps...I'm working o
accusing him of anything fraudulent with that
statement.
Regards,
Jason
On Nov 11, 2007 10:39 PM, Jason Utas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill, All,
>
> I just checked the thread: the claims against Leigh-Anne were
> unsubstantiated, and, seeing as she is a well-regarded member of th
years later, after the issue has been resolved), especially
when something as horrible as this comes up.
Jason
On Nov 11, 2007 9:10 PM, xxx wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:54:26 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Hello Bill, All,
> >I'm confused, Bill. I asked you for any evidence
out a kind member of the community
with no evidence to support your claims is nothing short of insulting,
given the situation.
Leigh-Ann, you have my best wishes for as speedy recovery as possible.
I hope all goes as well as it could for you.
Jason
On Nov 11, 2007 9:12 PM, GREG LINDH <[EMAIL P
r...? This has happened with a number of our
meteorites, namely a Chinga individual, but there have been a few
others...
Regards,
Jason
On 11/6/07, Moser Francesco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, on the week-end I was in Munich for the show, as usually a really
> nice show with a l
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/11/05/brighter.comet.ap/index.html
KNOXVILLE, Tennessee (AP) -- A comet that unexpectedly brightened in
the last couple of weeks and is now visible to the naked eye is
attracting professional and amateur interest.
[image]
Comet 17P/Holmes is seen among the stars
of anything. Simply put, it
looks like a Gibeon, and I thought this should be mentioned in case it
was of dubious origin (eg., purchased without a label, etc).
I didn't know that you and Keith were hunting around the crater thirty
or so years ago...damn, I wish one could go and hunt out t
.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Regards,
Jason
On 10/30/07, mckinney trammell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anybody know what this stuff might be?
> --- Darren Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:48:27 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
> >
> >
ather different than your average Canyon Diablo, I think all would
agree...
It brings to mind a Gibeon offered at Bonhams a few years ago by
Darryl Pitt (I'm fairly sure t'was his), though I believe that it was
a tad smaller.
I'm curious - what's its provenance?
Regards,
Jason
On 1
e subject...
Why don't you stop being so damn contrary just for the hell of it -
it's obvious what you're doing, "Thaddeus." If you have a bone to
pick with Michael, whoever you really are, keep it off-list, please.
It's not giving anyone anything remotely close to
nitial email; there's been enough on that subject
along those lines, and it's been talked both ways for weeks now. The
following responses, on the other hand, were extremely inappropriate.
It wouldn't matter if Nininger himself had posted that to the list; he
would still have been w
Sure doesn't look like a meteorite...at all
Have a look for yourself:
http://www.ksn.com/news/also/10574416.html
Regards,
Jason
On 10/18/07, Mike Groetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.dailytimesonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071016/NEWS01/71016045/1002/NEWS0
O-Iron-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ270175803889QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3239QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem_
Just remove the < > or _ _ and have a look - I thought his take on
geologic history was...amusing, to say the least.
Jason
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecent
This is a great loss for our meteorite collecting community, he was a truly
wonderful person. My prayers will be with his family.
With Deepest Sympathy,
Jason Phillips
- Original Message -
From: "Timothy Heitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October
ade or
so, it hasn't deviated from this schedule), it's the same as above...
Regards,
Jason
On 10/9/07, Dave Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to start making plans for the upcoming Tucson
> Show, and was wondering if anyone knows what the exact
> dates for the main week
this meteorite. Every meteorite has
the potiential to harbor organic compounds or fossilized remains and
should be studied. Give me leads or referrals is all I ask.
As another list member suggested, I believe that you can probably sell
the ~4kg of material that you supposedly paid $2,000 for, an
Hello All,
I've been asked to tell you that there are new pictures up on Mbark's
page - here's the url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
I'd just like to add that, at the moment, Mbark's posted prices are
~1/2 that of what other dealers are asking - for nearly identical, if
not mor
ing on. Unless you want to come up with
a separate source for the simultaneous appearance of noxious gasses, I
would suggest tying the crater/meteorite/steam explosion to the
noxious gasses. It's just too much of a coincidence.
To address the previous thread that I was a part of - to be fra
locity, not to mention the fact that without such
data, we don't even know what size the body initially was to any
reasonable degree, I would conclude that any such statement would have
had to have been made -very- prematurely.
Jason
On 9/20/07, Chris Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
uch stuff coming out of reporters from god-knows-where,
but from a JPL employee...
Jason
On 9/20/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scientists Doubt Meteorite Sickened Peruvians by
> By Andrea Thompson, Space.com, September 19, 2007
>
> http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070919
Hola,
I'm forwarding this on behalf of Mbark Ait Lkaid - I have no part in
this deal, though I must say that I would at least take a look at the
crust on some of the pieces even if not interested in
buying...freshest lunar material I've seen in a good while.
- Jason
---
Hello All,
I
Hello All,
Does anyone know the whereabouts of Terry Boswell? He's been
inexplicably unreachable for the past several months at the email
address that I have - if anyone has some current contact information,
I'd be much obliged for it.
Tha
reen-to-red Albin, Brahin, Brenham, Eagle Station, Ahumada, Admire,
Pallasovka, etc). The only pallasites with crystals of a reliable
colour are, to my knowledge, falls such as Marjalati and then Esquel
(green, but some external pieces have lost this hue), Imilac (yellow,
if there's any olivi
agami, Nigeria- Fell on October 3, 1962 near a farmer working in his
field. These thin part slices are around 1 mm thick and I have pieces
weighing up to 1 gram.
Have a great weekend,
Jason Phillips
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
Telephone: 217-832
agami, Nigeria- Fell on October 3, 1962 near a farmer working in his
field. These thin part slices are around 1 mm thick and I have pieces
weighing up to 1 gram.
Have a great weekend,
Jason Phillips
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
Telephone: 217-832
departure from God's Law and the
disenfranchisement of White men."
--State Rep. Don Davis (R-NC), emailed to every member of the North
Carolina House and Senate, reported by the Fayetteville Observer,
08-22-01
Right. Need I say more?
We're just as backwards and superstitious as
e - are still
members of the list. Good idea to use it to get to them in my
opinion.
I think you had two truly list-policy breaking messages there.
I'm almost certain that if I went back, I could find more than that
from you, attacking Steve, or doing whatever else.
Needless to say, I wil
And if you have a problem with someone breaking the list rules, you
contact Art, not the other 600 of us out here.
Otherwise you're just being a hypocrite.
Thank you,
Jason
On 8/5/07, Martin Altmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you very much.
> Martin
>
> -
forgive me, I have a most busy several days coming up, as
if the last few weren't fun enough. I daresay I'll ill-advisedly take
time out to answer emails, but I really do feel like resting the ol'
noggin for a bit.
Oh - and does anyone have any main masses laying about?
A new iron
brush on on their list-policy...
Jason
On 8/4/07, Mal Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Mike -- Yes, I think most of us know that, but Jason linked to
> www.meteoritetimes.com instead of www.meteoritecentral.com when he
> was making reference to the 8 rules guide li
as particularly insulting
or unjust or some such thing). In any case, take it off the list and
to Art. If it is a problem, he'll deal with it. I don't particularly
care to hear about this anymore.
Jason
On 8/4/07, PolandMET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed one point
itecentral
~main page~ :D
[I know it's not your fault Marcin - I know English isn't your first
language, and I recognize that my negotiating French websites, even
though I've taken four years of the language in school, and can speak
it reasonably well, would be highly pragmatic.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/orl-bk-nasacomputer072607,0,2959788.story?coll=ny-leadnationalnews-headlines
-
From Orlando Sentinel
NASA reports sabotage of computer by worker who cut wires
Marcia Dunn
The Associated Press
July 26, 2007, 4:51 PM EDT
CAPE CANAVER
-gallery.co.uk/showdown/index.php?showpic=55711
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
,
Jason
On 6/30/07, M come Meteorite Meteorites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
Da : "Jason Utas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A : Meteorite-list
Oggetto : Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks From Space Picture of
the Day - June 30, 2007
Data : Sat, 30 Jun 2007
y
not a CR, and looks more like a CO3, unless it's just an equilibrated
H...I can't tell from such low resolution.
Regards,
Jason
On 6/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.spacerocksinc.com/June_30_2007.html
***
iewitem=&item=260129905871&rd=1&rd=1
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
out of
NWA...aesthetics in this case are quite a bit more important than
whatever minuscule science could be gleaned from the H5 or L6 that it
most likely is.
Jason
Ohn 6/11/07, Don Rawlings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is an unclassified "meteorite" really a meteorite without scientific
ve
, entirely up to you.
Just...turn the lights off when you leave the room, please.
Jason
On 6/10/07, Sterling K. Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Rob, Michael, List
Here we go again!
"Global Warming - Scientifically Proven or A Farce?"
Bong, bong, bong! I'm sor
?ViewUserPage&userid=jnbran
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
lish speaker comes on and posts...it's sad, but even true
meteorite enthusiasts with good intentions get beaten up on here; it's
just a fact that hasn't changed in, well, the nine years I've been on
here.
Sorry this goes out to the list, but I do think it has something to do
with l
pm Ga and finally it is 11.7ppm Ir.
Load of crap, as you can see, both the data and the fact that it was
analysed without being cut.
So...beware of a 'Bob Frankline' or old material being passed off as a
'new NWA iron.' If the story's suspicious, or the irons doesn't look
would like some and the minimum purchase
is 1 kilo. Shipping will be extra.
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
specimen. It is a thin
end cut, 36mm X 27mm X 8mm (at widest points), and weighs 6.856 grams.
If you are interested in this specimen please email me for pictures or
with any questions.
Take Care,
Jason
Rocks from Heaven
www.rocksfromheaven.com
Martin Altmann wrote:
Almost correct,
the small
501 - 600 of 737 matches
Mail list logo
