Hmmm! sounds like what I've been led to BELIEVE. Jerry
- Original Message -
From: "drtanuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 6:54 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design
Dear List,
There i
pe, to God ;>), he is wrong, or at least
that this will not include Canada.
Cheers,
tett
Owen Sound, Ontario
From: "Jamie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "meteorite list"
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolutio
I'm having a difficult time understanding how the idea of God and evolution
can not co-exist. It is almost like if you believe in God, you must also
believe creationism, or if you believe evolution as fact, you can not
believe in God.
Perhaps there are other definitions of intelligent design, but
Howdy
There is drastic, deep and fundamental conflict between evolution and
intelligent design. To be brief, intelligent design requires the
magical intervention of a deity. That's exactly what it is - magic.
It has no place in a science class.
Evolution will probably never be proven. In
Just my personal belief here, but I believe it was the egg that came
first. Life begins in it's simplest form.
JKG
At 11:45 PM 5/12/2005, d freeman wrote:
Ok, I bite, which came first, the chicken or the egg?
DF
drtanuki wrote:
Mr. Gwilliam and List,
It is the dreamers, the ones that ask "fooli
anyone has any proof either way lets discuss that
rather than making generalities.
Regards to all
Phil Morgan
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "drtanuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:12 PM
Sub
Ok, I bite, which came first, the chicken or the egg?
DF
drtanuki wrote:
Mr. Gwilliam and List,
It is the dreamers, the ones that ask "foolish"
questions, the searchers/seekers that find the
answers. The ones that have all of the answers NEVER
will make progress for mankind or themselves. Many
t
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design
On Fri, 13 May 2005 04:35:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Accept the fact that we are too primitive to comprehend the workings of the
u
Mr. Gwilliam and List,
It is the dreamers, the ones that ask "foolish"
questions, the searchers/seekers that find the
answers. The ones that have all of the answers NEVER
will make progress for mankind or themselves. Many
times the question is more important than the answer
because the question
At 09:53 PM 5/12/2005, Darren Garrison wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 04:35:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Accept the fact that we are too primitive to comprehend the workings of
the universe and go with the flow.
No.
_
It's this kind of narrow-minded stand that has put this issue where it is
n
On Fri, 13 May 2005 04:35:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Accept the fact that we are too primitive to comprehend the workings of the
>universe and go with the flow.
No.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.
GOD, darren,
Don't you just love words like opinion, theory, conjecture. I'm humbled by the
process. Accept the fact that we are too primitive to comprehend the workings
of the universe and go with the flow.
Bill
-- Original message --
From: Darren Garrison <[
On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:48:36 -0500, "Jamie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>To me, intelligent design helps bridge the gap with those that believe in
>God or a creator and who also see evolution as a scientific fact.
But for intelligent design to "fit" with the fossil record would require a vast
nu
I don't see how intelligent design can be put in the same category as
creationism. My major in college was biology and I took an evolution course
or two. I've seen some of the creationist's "theories" and I believe that
science can disprove all of them quite easily.
It was when I took cell biolo
Hi Darren,
Thanks for the clarification.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design
On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46
On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46:34 -0600, "Phil Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey Darren,
>That was kind of mean-spirited.
>
>Let's see, if I believe in a God, I'm an inbred nitwit, but if I believe
I didn't say that. I said that if you believe in a Young Earth you are an
inbred nitwit. The p
discuss that
rather than making generalities.
Regards to all
Phil Morgan
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "drtanuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Lega
I know this is a serious (though off topic) topic, however, I realized
recently that I was letting the creationists annoy me too much. I thought
back to the 70's, when people seemed to take things more in stride and with
humor. I thought about the time Archie Bunker yelled to his son-in-la
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:16 -0700 (PDT), drtanuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>weaknesses in Darwinian Evolution). Evolution lacks
>total evidence (proof) and explanation in its argument
>and yet is taught as scientific fact. I am looking
Exact methods in the process of evolution are debatable,
y 12, 2005 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design
> Sounds like Dirk baiting (or would that be D baiting??)
>
>
>
> drtanuki wrote:
>
> > Dear List,
> > There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
&
Martin and List,
That would make a good movie! I was thinking Woody
Allen to be one of the Lawyers. Meow! Dirk
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
__
Meteor
Uh Oh
I knew this would happen. As I said to a friend who contacted me off
list, Dirk is a great guy and probably tired of some of the other
rantings in this List. I'm sure a lot of fellow Listees would say that
this is off topic. I know you are very serious about this, but there
are a lot of pe
(paleontologist, but don't tell them that
he was a jesuit!): Creation by Evolution. Creation in Evolution??
Buckleboo!
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "drtanuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 12:54 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Kansas L
Dear Dave and List,
I was, just now, watching Lou Dobbs on CNN and this
was news to me. Dave, I don`t understand what
D-baiting is. Historically Kansas was the center of
the Scopes-Monkey Trial (Creationism vs. Evolution).
An earlier thread on this list was about Transpermia
(Panspermia).
I
ent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:54 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design
Dear List,
There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
about what should be taught in schools, Creationism,
Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design
i
On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT), drtanuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear List,
> There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
>about what should be taught in schools, Creationism,
>Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design
>is a new paradigm that states that there was an
Sounds like Dirk baiting (or would that be D baiting??)
drtanuki wrote:
> Dear List,
> There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
> about what should be taught in schools, Creationism,
> Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design
> is a new paradigm that states that there was
Dear List,
There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
about what should be taught in schools, Creationism,
Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design
is a new paradigm that states that there was an
Intelligence behind the design of the Universe and
Creation of Life. What are the
28 matches
Mail list logo
