Dear Mark, and List;
I have been oozing over with bliss since I have been seeing the "wanta
be" process and the "reality is reality" post. Ol' Arley from the TV
show "MAIL CALL" uses a few terms that seems to fit...Maybe we could
start up a "Meteorite Mail Call" to ferret out the "grabassticall
Mike Tettenbon wrote: "Correct me if I'm wrong but, doesn't one have to wait until the classification is published by the Nomenclature Committee of the Meteoritical Society before anyone can say for sure what the official name is? " You are correct Mike. It is not up to Steve Arnold or anyone e
Title: Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja
Hello All
For those of you that have purchased Kilabo/Hadejia from me--as it says on the cards I enclosed with the meteorites--I will be sending out new cards and labels when the NomCom information is in. If Kilabo is the name accepted
ubject: Re: [meteorite-list] update on
kilabo/hadeja
Correct me if I'm wrong but, doesn't one have to
wait until the classification is published by
the Nomenclature
Committee of the Meteoritical Society before
anyone can say for sure what the official name is?
Mi
--
From:
STEVE
ARNOLD
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 1:07
PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] update on
kilabo/hadeja
I have been in contact with my source, and I found out that these (2)
meteorites are the same. They fell in different areas, but it f
I have been in contact with my source, and I found out that these (2) meteorites are the same. They fell in different areas, but it fell closer to hadeja, thus the name. Around 8 to 12 kilos were found. I also learned as of this thanksgiving, that this meteorite was officially classified here in ch
6 matches
Mail list logo
