This is great news. Congratulations and kudos to you, John, for such a
great effort. But, please, tell us the title of the book, so I could
preorder it in the closest Dymocks. Thanks for that!
P.S. Hopefully I could get you to sign it for me.
___
micro
Hi all,
it's no great secret, but many people on the list probably won't know
I've been working on a book solely on microformats for Friends of Ed,
the web design/development focussed offshoot of Apress, these last
few months. Apart from Brian Suda's PDF book, and of course chapters
in so
I'd be interested in a get together at the end of the
month. To that end, I've created a wiki page with my
suggestion.
Feel free to make other suggestions on the page:
http://microformats.org/wiki/events/2007-01-la-microformats-gettogether-planning
-ml
--- Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael McCracken wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
> > umich
> > ning
> > Google
> >
> > However, they use "retrieved" rather than accessed,
> although
Michael McCracken wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
> > umich
> > ning
> > Google
> >
> > However, they use "retrieved" rather than accessed,
> although it is the
> > same meaning.
> >
> > What would be
On 1/17/07, M. Jackson Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
>> publication date: 21
>> date accessed: 3
>> date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
>>
>
> --- the other senario is to strip this down to the basics for a
> version 1 and NOT include those lesser used
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael McCracken wrote:
> Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the
> following frequencies of marking up a date:
>
> publication date: 21
> date accessed: 3
> date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
Actually, date acces
Brian Suda wrote:
>> publication date: 21
>> date accessed: 3
>> date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
>>
>
> --- the other senario is to strip this down to the basics for a
> version 1 and NOT include those lesser used dates, then use hCite for
> awhile, see what falls down and itterate
Michael McCracken wrote:
> Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the
> following frequencies of marking up a date:
>
> publication date: 21
> date accessed: 3
> date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
umich
nin
On 1/17/07, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the following
frequencies of marking up a date:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
I just added date-accessed to the working straw sch
Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the following
frequencies of marking up a date:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
I just added date-accessed to the working straw schema.
Certainly all three are useful, but can we find more
On 1/17/2007 Brian Suda said:
>--- i don't feel it is appropriate for us to mandate how to encode
>microformats. If i want to create a citation in prose inside a
>paragraph, then i should be able to 'hang' the class="hcite" on the
>block-level or . Microformats are all about NOT changing
>user's b
On 16/01/07, Aaron Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been hearing about microformats for quite awhile now, but the
concept finally clicked with me over the last few months. I've since
been adding hCard and hEvent markup whenever I can, but I've come
onto a fundamental question.
Do I add micr
On 1/17/07, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a note about using as the recommended root element - I
don't feel strongly about this - does anyone else? I suppose a final
standard should have a note to suggest using when appropriate,
but I'm not concerned about it now.
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
