[uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Rickards, Julian (NDM)
Hi: I am working on our government web site and am working towards implementing the hCard microformat for our contact pages. However, I am having a bit of difficulty with phone numbers. To verify my work, I installed the Tails Export extension for Firefox but when I export to Microsoft Outlook

RE: [uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Montgomery, Mike
I was able to get phone numbers to export into Outlook by specifying a type and value. I have updated your example as follows: div class=vcardspan class=fnJim McAuley/span, span class=telspan class=value705-670-5855/span (span class=typeWork/span)/span, a class=email href=mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [uf-discuss] uF dumped in tag soup?

2007-06-20 Thread Ryan King
On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Dougal Campbell wrote: Okay, so I started a new job recently. The web site and service has a lot to do with SEO. But despite that, the HTML is a mess of table-based layout and tag soup. I'm hoping I can change that in time, but it won't happen quickly. But one

Re: [uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Ryan King
On Jun 20, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Rickards, Julian (NDM) wrote: Hi: I am working on our government web site and am working towards implementing the hCard microformat for our contact pages. However, I am having a bit of difficulty with phone numbers. To verify my work, I installed the Tails

RE: [uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Rickards, Julian (NDM)
Your suggestion seems to agree with what Ryan wrote moments before you that type must be specified. However, given that all of the numbers are work (voice) numbers and everyone in my work group shares a common fax number, it seemed redundant to write span class=typeWork/span for each person. It

Re: [uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Scott Reynen
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Rickards, Julian (NDM) wrote: However, given that all of the numbers are work (voice) numbers and everyone in my work group shares a common fax number, it seemed redundant to write span class=typeWork/ span for each person. You can use the include pattern to

Re: [uf-discuss] Question about telephone numbers

2007-06-20 Thread Paul Wilkins
- Original Message - From: Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can use the include pattern to remove some of this redundancy: http://microformats.org/wiki/include-pattern E.g.: pStaff span class=type id=work-typework/span phone numbers:/p ... div class=vcard p class=fnPerson One/p p

[uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Question about telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] recommended: a href=#work-title class=include/a I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? -- Andy Mabbett ___ microformats-discuss mailing

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread Paul Wilkins
From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? -- Paul Wilkins ___ microformats-discuss mailing list

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread James Craig
Paul Wilkins wrote: From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? The object include pattern has some performance problems, it would be best to

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was:Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread Paul Wilkins
From: James Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Wilkins wrote: Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? The object include pattern has some performance problems, it would be best to use the anchor include pattern but include some text indicated the marker that was being

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread James Craig
James Craig wrote: Paul Wilkins wrote: From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? The object include pattern has some performance problems, it

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was:Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread Michael MD
Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? given the complexity it adds to non-browser-based parsers I'm wondering if include-pattern is too much trouble to bother with ___ microformats-discuss mailing list