Finished an RDFa Basics video this weekend. It attempts to explain RDF,
CURIEs, N3 and basic RDFa in 8 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldl0m-5zLz4
Thought some of you would want to learn about some of the upcoming
features of XHTML2 as well as compare and contrast how RDFa differs from
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Jan 7, 2008 9:54 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nor should you replace 31 Dec 2007 with 2008-01-01, as is currently
done in:
abbr class=dtend title=2008-01-0131 Dec 2007/abbr
I can't understand how
The rel-tag specification says that tags ought to be HTTP URIs.
In a page I'm authoring at the moment, I'm using non-HTTP URIs as tags
- specifically I'm using irc: URIs (like
irc://irc.freenode.net/microformats) as tags.
Operator seems fine with it. I'm wondering whether other tag parsers
On 07/01/2008, Tom Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rel-tag specification says that tags ought to be HTTP URIs.
In a page I'm authoring at the moment, I'm using non-HTTP URIs as tags
--- this is interesting. I can´t speak for the original intent of only
HTTP, but one reason might be
Manu Sporny wrote:
Constructive feedback would be great, as I'll probably be doing the
advanced RDFa tutorial in a month or so, and will need to know what
worked and what didn't in the RDFa Basics video.
I'm relatively new to RDFa and this is a great introduction. I'm
probably going to say
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
I want to specify a work-related telephone number, but I just want to
label it 'Phone:'. The closest I can find to do this is the abbr,
however, work is not an abbreviation of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], ryan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
I want to specify a work-related telephone number, but I just want to
label it 'Phone:'. The closest I can find to do
On Jan 7, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
@class wasn't used because they didn't want to stomp on the
Microformats
community's implementation, among other reasons. In certain RDFa
implementations, bad things happened when you mixed RDFa and
Microformats on the same page.
Can you maybe
On 1/7/08 11:52 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], ryan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
I want to specify a work-related telephone number, but I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In any case, how is that different from:
abbr class=dtstart title=2008-01-077 Jan/abbr
where 2008 is hidden?
title attribute is displayed in tool-tips
in some, but far from all, browsers.
On 1/7/08 2:42 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In any case, how is that different from:
abbr class=dtstart title=2008-01-077 Jan/abbr
where 2008 is hidden?
title attribute is displayed in tool-tips
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
title attribute is displayed in tool-tips
in some, but far from all, browsers.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.4.3
Values of the title attribute may be rendered by user agents in
a
On 1/7/08 3:46 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Data in the class attribute is a known anti-pattern.
extended-address, street-address, locality, region - all just as much
data in class attributes.
properties!=values. types/schema are not just as much data.
Tantek
Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 1/7/08 2:42 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In any case, how is that different from:
abbr class=dtstart title=2008-01-077 Jan/abbr
where 2008 is hidden?
title attribute is displayed
On 1/7/08 4:01 PM, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 1/7/08 2:42 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In any case, how is that different from:
abbr class=dtstart title=2008-01-077
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 1/7/08 3:46 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Data in the class attribute is a known anti-pattern.
extended-address, street-address, locality, region - all just as much
data in class attributes.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
I just don't seem to understand how the Microformats community decides
what sort of meta-data is acceptable and what others aren't?
The /community/ doesn't. That's part of the problem.
--
Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Mostly microformats just markup existing data in the page so that
machines can find it and know what type of data it is.
The name:
Rebecca Jayne Smith
can be marked up - correctly and validly - as either:
foo
On 1/7/08 4:46 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 1/7/08 3:46 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Data in the class attribute is a known anti-pattern.
extended-address, street-address, locality, region
Andy Mabbett wrote:
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled
each telephone number as work?
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that included
the managers' home numbers?
In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last see a phone
On 1/7/08 5:19 PM, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to avoid the meta discussion and go back to Kat's specific problem
(she wants to specify a phone as work but without the content containing
work or any of its abbreviations), maybe something that would work
would be to have an
Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 1/7/08 5:19 PM, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voice in fact is already default value of the type sub-property for tel:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#adr_tel_email_types
Thanks for the pointer. Sorry I missed that.
Perhaps you could document your
Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled
each telephone number as work?
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that included
the managers' home numbers?
In that same vein, we could ask: when
I suppose I should have posted this in the mailing list:
http://rbach.priv.at/Microformats/IRC/2007-12-06#T192503
-Sarven
On 1/7/08, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled
24 matches
Mail list logo
