There have been some interesting blog posts by people at the BBC,
Mozilla and W3C about Microformats and RDFa in the past two days. The
first covers BBC's decision to drop support for the abbr-based design
pattern written by Michael Smethurst (who worked with this community on
hAudio among other
On 24/06/2008, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Manu,
Thanks for the links. I'm trying to keep track of all the
converastions popping up around this.
Some are moving too quickly to dismiss both Microformats AND RDFa - the
two communities are cross-pollinating and there has been
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:03:30 -0400
From: Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [uf-discuss] Microformats and RDFa not as far apart as
previously thought
To: Microformats Discuss microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Belov, Charles wrote:
I feel it is unreasonable to ask a non-technical person to produce
ISO-format dates/times, so microformats do not produce an acceptable
solution at this time for marking up meeting announcements.
I agree that only an editor extension would make writing ISO-format
Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
span class=dstart lang=en-usOctober 5, 2004/span
Cognition already supports this as a last ditch attempt at parsing
dates - but I wouldn't recommend it get adopted widely. It's too
unreliable; too much work to deal with internationalisation; too much
work
Toby A Inkster wrote:
Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
span class=dstart lang=en-usOctober 5, 2004/span
Cognition already supports this as a last ditch attempt at parsing
dates -
Thank you for the attempt.
but I wouldn't recommend it get adopted widely. It's too unreliable;
Why is this that
