are a bad idea. You can use custom RELAX NG
without polluting you markup with schema-specific declaration cruft at http://validator.nu/
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-dis
uot; isn't allowed as the time zone
designator, even though it is less verbose than +00:00.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://mic
On Mar 10, 2007, at 21:46, Henri Sivonen wrote:
I needed a .bib-based bibliography generator for XHTML, so I wrote
one with help from a friend who had developed a .bib parser.
In case others are interested, I've published the source code.
There's no documentation to speak
already got rid of profile='' before the W3C adopted the draft.
There may be some pressure to put it back due to theoretical
considerations. This is part of the Descriptivist vs. Prescriptivist
debate. It looks pretty obvious that microformat consumers experience
more practical
On Apr 5, 2007, at 01:28, Ryan King wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 20:10, Ryan King wrote:
FNs with more than 3 tokens are perfectly fine, it's just that
there's no implied-n rule that can deal with it, so the creator
needs to expli
when the generator has formatted names but does not have data about
the token roles available. :-(
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://micr
On Mar 28, 2007, at 21:00, Ryan King wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Then it appears that hCard creator (http://microformats.org/code/
hcard/creator) is broken.
If I enter "Jesus Maria" as the given name and "van der Boer y
Gonzales" as th
ter explaining why having
more than two tokens in an fn is not allowed when the information
about the roles of the tokens is unavailable to the producer of the
markup. Is this something that has been inherited wholesale from vCard?
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mar 24, 2007, at 02:48, Henri Sivonen wrote:
The current markup is:
[AXML]http://www.xml.com/pub/
a/axml/axmlintro.html">The Annotated XML 1.0
Specification. Tim Bray, Jean Paoli
and C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, editors. class="publisher">O’Reilly Media, Inc., cl
time being, I'd guess that .bib is better supported than hCite.
That way when you update the
HTML page, you do NOT have to update several other files as well since
they are dynamically created from the single SOURCE XHTML file.
In my case, the .bib is the source file.
--
Henri Sivonen
[
On Mar 23, 2007, at 14:22, Paul Wilkins wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2007, at 23:10, Paul Wilkins wrote:
You are using the BibTex format, which is covered in the
citation formats http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-formats
Sure, but considering that I share my .bib, should I
(Sorry about my frustrated tone. I always get frustrated when I try
to extract implementation directions from the wiki and fail. This
isn't the first time. And I can read specs in general.)
On Mar 10, 2007, at 23:10, Paul Wilkins wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
I needed a .bib-
nrik Frystyk Nielsen
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
n any conformance requirements for these formats? (The
specs seem to encourage view source instead of pointing to
conformance criteria.)
I am developing a conformance checker for HTML5, and HTML5 may end up
making a normative reference to hCalendar and hCard.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROT
14 matches
Mail list logo
