Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread Paul Wilkins
From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? -- Paul Wilkins ___ microformats-discuss mailing list

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread James Craig
Paul Wilkins wrote: From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? The object include pattern has some performance problems, it would be best to

Re: [uf-discuss] Empty anchor tag-pairs and accessibility (was: Questionabout telephone numbers)

2007-06-20 Thread James Craig
James Craig wrote: Paul Wilkins wrote: From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from an accessibility PoV? Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern? The object include pattern has some performance problems, it