On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
And maybe that's because what you're describing is actually more
specific that "related hCards" implies. It seems here you're just
talking about a single relationship: identity.
Ryan King wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> > And maybe that's because what you're describing is actually more
> > specific that "related hCards" implies. It seems here you're just
> > talking about a single relationship: identity.
>
> Yes. You're exactly right. I'm a
On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Feb 20, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Ryan King wrote:
However, the simpler problem of two hcards representing the same
person (or organization) should be solved first, because it is a
simpler problem, with a simpler solution (which may not require
On Feb 20, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Ryan King wrote:
However, the simpler problem of two hcards representing the same
person (or organization) should be solved first, because it is a
simpler problem, with a simpler solution (which may not require
adding any properties to hCard).
The implication
