How about a courtesy link on the front page of the Web site:
If this is not the Microformats you're looking for, perhaps you meant http://
--Bob.
This is what Mike Schinkel microformats-discuss@microformats.org said
about RE: [uf-discuss] Re: MicroFormat Ltd on 7 Nov 2006 at 15:14
I highly
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things to be handled when your
guidance on
how to handle
On 11/9/06 12:21 AM, Bob Jonkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a courtesy link on the front page of the Web site:
I've created a disambiguation page on the wiki for the term microformat
based on some wording that Chris Messina authored. I think this should
suffice for now.
On 11/9/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a disambiguation page on the wiki for the term microformat
based on some wording that Chris Messina authored. I think this should
suffice for now.
http://microformats.org/wiki/microformat
Looks good and should suffice.
Chris
The registered owner of the domain
Umm, as the owner, I'd like to suggest we all calm down and let
things lie. As the actual registrant of the domains
microformats.org/com under the auspices of CommerceNet, LLC, I'm sure
that any issues of our proper use of it would fall under the rubric of
our
://www.welldesignedurls.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rohit
Khare
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:08 PM
To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: [uf-discuss] Re: MicroFormat, Ltd.
The registered owner of the domain
Umm
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rohit
Khare
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:08 PM
To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: [uf-discuss] Re: MicroFormat, Ltd.
The registered owner of the domain
Umm, as the owner, I'd like to suggest we all calm down and let things
lie
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Schinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things to be handled when your guidance on
how to handle the
On Nov 8, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike
Schinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things
I highly doubt that it will cause real confusion; furthermore, who
would be sued? No one owns the microformats name besides the community
-- which is why it's a community mark. We really don't have any assets
or formal structure, so it would be rather difficult to bring this to
court.
But that's
Discuss
Subject: [uf-discuss] Re: MicroFormat Ltd
I highly doubt that it will cause real confusion; furthermore, who would be
sued? No one owns the microformats name besides the community
-- which is why it's a community mark. We really don't have any assets or
formal structure, so it would
11 matches
Mail list logo
