Ben,
Even in the past 10 days, only a small minority of people have shown
an inclination to engage in this meta-discussion.
there might be cultural reasons for that.
I for myself have bitten my tongue, as I've found these discussions
tend to produce negative outcomes.
But I'd suggest
Le 18 mars 2008 à 07:27, John Allsopp a écrit :
there might be cultural reasons for that.
I for myself have bitten my tongue, as I've found these discussions
tend to produce negative outcomes.
But I'd suggest that lack of piping up on this form is not entirely
evidence that people don't
David Janes said:
I'm very sympathetic to the case Ryan,
et. al. are making. If the Wiki becomes a battleground for edits over
pedantic over-interpretation of the community rules and standards, it
will quickly become useless to anyone and a time drain on everyone.
I read the how-to-play
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:27 PM, John Allsopp wrote:
Even in the past 10 days, only a small minority of people have
shown an inclination to engage in this meta-discussion.
But I'd suggest that lack of piping up on this form is not entirely
evidence that people don't care.
It's important (for
On 15 Mar 2008, at 22:09, Jesse Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a risk that without the formality, leadership, andstrength
then why doesn't IE8 rename things and add a little bit here
and there? How about Google? They may want their own gCal format
because hCal is just a hobby. Does
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eric A. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think anyone's ever been voted into the position of
anything in the microformats community, because it's really not a
process-driven kind of place. There's no process for approving new
microformats, for
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner.
I'm likewise back from vacation now, so just now responding to this.
It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This
At 4:45 PM -0500 3/8/08, Manu Sporny wrote:
With respect, I have no idea how Drew McLellan, Eric A. Meyer, and Dan
Cederholm became admins. Is there a secret handshake? Were they voted
into the position? How are these things done?
Sorry, I missed this bit until just now.
I can only
On 13/03/2008, Eric A. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
e-mail and IM servers. (Do communication protocols even use
handshakes any more?)
yes
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
+1
On 8/3/08 21:45, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is
On 8 Mar 2008, at 21:45, Manu Sporny wrote:
Andy was tried as guilty, without complete documentation
There is still no documentation as to what Andy has done in the
past to
warrant this type of ban. In the admin's post to the list,
On 8 Mar 2008, at 21:45, Manu Sporny wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been
banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is one of
the
Likewise,
john
On 09/03/2008, at 9:38 AM, Jeff McNeill wrote:
+1
--
Sincerely,
Jeff McNeill
http://jeffmcneill.com/
On 3/8/08, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has
Perhaps a ban on editing wiki pages that are not being championed by
Andy would be more appropriate? I'm very sympathetic to the case Ryan,
et. al. are making. If the Wiki becomes a battleground for edits over
pedantic over-interpretation of the community rules and standards, it
will quickly
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is one of
the largest contributors to our community. Rather than
I must say I was embarrassed to read Manu's response to Andy's ban due
to not speaking out about the ban sooner. I felt that there must have
been something that the admins knew better then myself about this
'slowing down the process' business. I was nevertheless shocked to
hear about the ban
+1
--
Sincerely,
Jeff McNeill
http://jeffmcneill.com/
On 3/8/08, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust
Hello
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I have had more purposeful discussion with people off-list than on-list as of
late
Unfortunately, I'd have to agree with this too.
A number things I've done lately have been under the banner of
Semantic HTML
On 3/9/08, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner. It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This is an unjust punishment, especially considering that he is one of
the
1.) Quantity != Quality. (Maybe Web 2.0 decided otherwise, but I'm old
school.)
2.) No one person is worth more than the cohesiveness of a community in
the case of community development.
3.) Andy != Gandhi. Overthrowing the rule of a foreign power is
unrelated to anything that happens in
Derrick,
I'd like to address each of your statements as they seem to be assuming
things that were not said in the post to the mailing list.
Derrick Lyndon Pallas wrote:
1.) Quantity != Quality. (Maybe Web 2.0 decided otherwise, but I'm old
school.)
The argument that quantity == quality was
21 matches
Mail list logo
