Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread Drew McLellan
On 20 Jul 2006, at 19:37, Ted Drake wrote: I'm trying the latest version of the include pattern and I'm still not seeing the product title appear in the reviews. This is near the top of the page: h2 id=prodname class=item fnApple iPod nano 2GB Black MP3 Player/h2 And this is in the

Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread Frances Berriman
I can screenread those for you today. I'll send you what I get fromt them. Frances On 7/21/06, Drew McLellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20 Jul 2006, at 19:37, Ted Drake wrote: I'm trying the latest version of the include pattern and I'm still not seeing the product title appear in the

Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread Drew McLellan
On 21 Jul 2006, at 11:41, Frances Berriman wrote: I can screenread those for you today. I'll send you what I get fromt them. Awesome, thanks! drew. ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org

Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread brian suda
At the moment there are no implementations (that i am aware of) that also take into account the visual design. For special properties, such as DESCRIPTION, i have started to take into consideration the types of elements, strong li, etc and adjusted the ASCII output to mimic it as best possible.

Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread Frances Berriman
We currently ignore children of DEL elements, you could make an argument that if you are hiding it and don't want people to see it, then we should honor that and not transform it... HTML comments are hidden and ignored... so maybe other hidden content should be as well? Just food for thought.

Re: [uf-discuss] testing results - was hcard question

2006-07-21 Thread Chris Casciano
On Jul 21, 2006, at 11:51 AM, brian suda wrote: So, at the moment, just because Implementations do not take into consideration display:none, doesn't mean that in the future they will as well. We currently ignore children of DEL elements, you could make an argument that if you are hiding