Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-14 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes seem to equate currency with both language and nation on a 1-1 basis. I misread their page - the above is not the case for language (but is for country). -- Andy Mabbett Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:

Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-12 Thread Guillaume Lebleu
Ted Drake wrote: I would thin this standard could be adopted quickly via microformats. What are the thoughts? I think microformats would probably help adoption with the less sophisticated (smaller) retailers quickly, but would not satisfy all the business needs of more sophisticated

Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-12 Thread Scott Reynen
On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote: I think microformats would probably help adoption with the less sophisticated (smaller) retailers quickly, but would not satisfy all the business needs of more sophisticated manufacturers. I agree. See the ARTS data model

RE: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Schinkel
: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:50 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information Ted Drake wrote: I would thin this standard could be adopted quickly via microformats. What are the thoughts? I think microformats would probably help adoption

RE: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Schinkel
5:21 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote: I think microformats would probably help adoption with the less sophisticated (smaller) retailers quickly, but would not satisfy all

Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information

2006-10-12 Thread David Janes
Damnit, I was about to coin that one. On 10/12/06, Mike Schinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow. At 1.5MB of documentation, that's pretty much the antithesis of a microformat. Holy $h1t! Maybe we should call that one a Macroformat? Hehe. ;) -Mike