Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Le 5 oct. 06 à 10:08, Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : Software Downloads (license, download link, title, description, rating?) Might actually start some research and suggest this soon. Already done. It's called DOAP http://usefulinc.com/doap -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Definately interesting, but a microformat/semantic XHTML version would also be nice. Plus, shareware/trial downloads should be able to be represented too. Ultimately a search engine could search by license/limitations as well as title/description, filtering out shareware etc. if you don't want i

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

There has been some work done to model DOAP in XHTML. Pretty much all the tools have been created and are ready to use. http://dannyayers.com:88/xmlns/hdoap/profile/index.xhtml -brian Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Definately interesting, but a microformat/semantic XHTML version would > also be ni

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Wikis are awesome and a page to collect all this can't hurt anything :) Is hDOAP going to be suggested into the microformats.org community? Has it already and I just can't find the wiki pages? What about, as I've mentioned, the ability to l

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Le 5 oct. 06 à 20:50, Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : Definately interesting, but a microformat/semantic XHTML version would also be nice. Plus, shareware/trial downloads should be able to be represented too. Ultimately a search engine could search by license/limitations as well as title/descript

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Getting there... ;) You'll note in my original message I said that I was 'planning on doing research and suggesting soon'... that was not a real suggestion, but since a bunch of messages about existing work came in I figured organising that a bit couldn't hurt ;) Real-world examples are coming.

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

I could have sworn I mailed this or the dev list about hDOAP [1] , but I can't find anything substantial in the archives, probably forgot the cc...anyhow basically it's a way of describing software projects in HTML, based on DOAP [2] which could potentially become a microformat (according to micro

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

On 10/5/06 9:18 AM, "Danny Ayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could have sworn I mailed this or the dev list about hDOAP [1] , but > I can't find anything substantial in the archives, probably forgot the > cc...anyhow basically it's a way of describing software projects in > HTML, based on DO

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Le 5 oct. 06 à 20:50, Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : >>Ultimately a search engine could search by >> license/limitations as well as title/description, filtering out >> shareware etc. if you don't want it, allowing it if you

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >What is lacking is following the process step by step: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/process > >starting with a *-examples page, then a *-formats page (which should >list DOAP of course), and *then* a *-brainstorming page.

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

On Oct 5, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Wikis are awesome and a page to collect all this can't hurt anything :) Is hDOAP going to be suggested into the microformats.org community? Has it already and I just can't find the

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

On 05/10/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't follow microformats.org process, though I do believe some of > the key prerequisites have been fulfilled. This is the key. Just taking an existing format and translating them to class names is not enough - as the folks working on

Re: Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

On 10/5/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't follow microformats.org process, though I do believe some of > the key prerequisites have been fulfilled. This is the key. Just taking an existing format and translating them to class names is not enough - as the folks working on