[Mikrotik] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Butch Evans
I thought I'd post a message to address some of the expressed concerns regarding the online training. Some posted concerns to the mailing lists and those I have already replied to onlist. Because some of you are not on all the available mailing lists, here is the archive of the survey thread

Re: [Mikrotik] [WISP List] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Josh Luthman
9 *ImageStream * > *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE * > *http://blog.butchevans.com/*Wired or wireless Networks* > *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer* > > ___ > Wisp mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/wisp > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080927/3c340424/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Richard Hatherill Jr.
chevans.com/ *Wired or wireless Networks * *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080927/0ac7b2b8/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Butch Evans
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Richard Hatherill Jr. wrote: The cost of your vendor seems way to high. Take a look at the product. http://www.netop.com/netop-1229.htm That's a windows product. I don't do windows. Not to mention they don't list their prices, which always makes me hesitant. Either w

Re: [Mikrotik] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Josh Luthman
__ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080927/7d20021e/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] Survey results so far

2008-09-27 Thread Butch Evans
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Josh Luthman wrote: Maybe Fedora + VMWare for "Windows"? =) I would consider it, but it requires a Windows server platform. as little as I like Windows in general, I REALLY don't like Windows Server. To me, "Windows Server" is a little like a color called "White Black