Re: [Mikrotik] Bonding

2011-12-23 Thread Scott Reed
You can not combine 2 anything lines unless both ends support the same type of bonding. Butches suggestion is that you divide the outbound traffic between the 2. If you are using NAT, the other end will reply back to the sameinterface at your end, thus dividing the inbound traffic between the

[Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Stuart Pierce
I'm dense. Why is it a cpe in router mode authenticated to a Tik hotspot will have other ip addresses in the hotspot hosts with obviously the same mac address as the authenticated mac address in the hotspot. The cpe is a ubnt device in router mode with now the latest beta9, where one of the

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Chupaka
://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20111223/c9fb50bb/attachment.html

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Eric Muehleisen
@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20111223

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Blake Covarrubias
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote: I'm dense. Why is it a cpe in router mode authenticated to a Tik hotspot will have other ip addresses in the hotspot hosts with obviously the same mac address as the authenticated mac address in the hotspot. Two IP's in the same subnet?

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Stuart Pierce
I don't have a limit on addresses per mac, but this situation tends to exhaust the pool and I think cause some weird problems. In my feeble mind, I think that all requests from that mac, that authenticated ip, should only go through that mac/ip. -- Original Message

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Stuart Pierce
My thinking is that any requests behind that router should come from it's assigned ip address. It's acting like if it wants to go to google, the ip address for google comes through and gets an ip address from the dhcp pool and it's listed in the hosts. I need a Christmas Ale, heck with this.

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Blake Covarrubias
On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote: My thinking is that any requests behind that router should come from it's assigned ip address. It's acting like if it wants to go to google, the ip address for google comes through and gets an ip address from the dhcp pool and it's listed

Re: [Mikrotik] Seriously

2011-12-23 Thread Stuart Pierce
It is now to test it out, it isn't on the wan side ( the backhaul ) of the tower. -- Original Message -- From: Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com Reply-To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:20:19 -0700 On Dec