You can not combine 2 anything lines unless both ends support the same
type of bonding.
Butches suggestion is that you divide the outbound traffic between the
2. If you are using NAT, the other end will reply back to the
sameinterface at your end, thus dividing the inbound traffic between the
I'm dense.
Why is it a cpe in router mode authenticated to a Tik hotspot
will have other ip addresses in the hotspot hosts with obviously
the same mac address as the authenticated mac address in the
hotspot.
The cpe is a ubnt device in router mode with now the latest
beta9, where one of the
://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20111223/c9fb50bb/attachment.html
@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20111223
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
I'm dense.
Why is it a cpe in router mode authenticated to a Tik hotspot
will have other ip addresses in the hotspot hosts with obviously
the same mac address as the authenticated mac address in the
hotspot.
Two IP's in the same subnet?
I don't have a limit on addresses per mac, but this situation
tends to exhaust the pool and I think cause some weird problems.
In my feeble mind, I think that all requests from that mac, that
authenticated ip, should only go through that mac/ip.
-- Original Message
My thinking is that any requests behind that router should come
from it's assigned ip address. It's acting like if it wants to
go to google, the ip address for google comes through and gets
an ip address from the dhcp pool and it's listed in the hosts.
I need a Christmas Ale, heck with this.
On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
My thinking is that any requests behind that router should come
from it's assigned ip address. It's acting like if it wants to
go to google, the ip address for google comes through and gets
an ip address from the dhcp pool and it's listed
It is now to test it out, it isn't on the wan side ( the
backhaul ) of the tower.
-- Original Message --
From: Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com
Reply-To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:20:19 -0700
On Dec
9 matches
Mail list logo