Sweet, I think I can work with that. Much appreciation!!
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Reed"
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 3:23:41 PM
Su
s
possible now more than anything and see it work. :P
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:59:09 PM
Subje
I could do something like an array "$interface[$count]", or even just some
way of appending a variable like "$interface.$count" but that doesn't work. So
unless someone has a solution, I'm stuck.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Inter
If I ever get that last piece figured out, you're more than welcome to it. :)
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Ty Featherling"
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Monday,
would like a little more information in the email than what the
logging system provides.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
___
Mikrotik mailing list
M
Make sure you set up your filters too.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Ty Featherling"
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:49:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Mikr
Thanks that will make my life a lot easier when I reboot next time and forget
the reason why it doesn't work and have to troubleshoot it all again :)
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: &quo
nd as root..
$ echo 64 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/hop_limit
The catch is that only works until a reboot or the interface is restarted or
unplugged.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "
Tried on my MAC and it works fine. This is an issue with my PC not the Tik or
the he tunnel. Thanks for the assistance I really appreciate it.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher
Pinging 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::93 works fine from the router.
>From the PC I can ping my side of the tunnel but not the remote side.
>From the PC to any IP on the router, pings work fine. I only get timeout/Hop
>Limit on IP's past the router.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTC
ms
10 * * *
11 google-public-dns-a.google.com (2001:4860:4860::) 63.926 ms 63.609 ms
61.127 ms
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Reed"
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent:
2001:470::1::1 icmp_seq=5 Time exceeded: Hop limit
--- 2001:4860:4860:: ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 received, +5 errors, 100% packet loss, time 3999ms
Any other ideas?
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
metric 256
default via fe80::4e5e:cff:fe03:25d5 dev eth0 proto static metric 1024
Any ideas or comments are appreciated...
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mik
Funny, the beta (v3.0beta3) works fine for me and I'm using wine to run it on a
Linux box.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
- Original Message -
From: "Grand Avenue Broadband"
To: "Mikrotik discuss
Dennis is also doing a 5 day course for essentially the same price after AF.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 11/16/2010 09:11 PM, RickG wrote:
SLC is too far away. Might go to St. Louis but 5 days away is hard.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Butch Evans wrote
Not sure what they are actually called, but there are wire mesh tubes
that resemble a finger trap, so as the cable pulls it gets tighter, we
use them on towers and you can place them at various points along the
cable to reduce the load.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On
That was it.. I could have sworn that I tried that already.
I think with that and the previous NAT troubles, I'm all fixed up for now.
Thanks again guys, you were a God send.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 04:06 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I(f you'
No attachments to the list.. Try this instead...
http://mowisp.com/Selection_007.png
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 02:11 PM, Christopher Tyler wrote:
I'm trying to graph the traffic on the WAN and LAN ports of my MikroTik
in Cacti but the graph
s no CDEF function set up. Is
that not the correct OID?
Any ideas as to what need to do to get this to report properly?
--
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Selection_007.png
Type: image/png
Si
Okay, first on it is.
Thanks for all the help guys.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 12:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
First one looks better.
On Sep 26, 2010 1:00 PM, "Christopher Tyler" wrote:
Masquerade does not have a 'to-address' option
on=netmap chain=srcnat disabled=no out-interface=WAN\
src-address=172.19.0.0/24 to-addresses=xxx..xxx.xxx
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 12:32 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Christopher Tyler wrote:
We have another netw
argumentative, especially since you are trying to help, but I've looked
several times and there is nothing there.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 12:46 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Masquerade is srcnat'ing it.
The problem is that the public are too, right? If so the
It's a collision detect thing from what I understand. But I've also
read that with the speeds that modern Ethernet interfaces operate at,
that it's no longer an issue. But it can't hurt to try another cable if
you have ruled out everything else.
Christopher
I know that there is a specified minimum cable length for CAT5 cables.
Some sources say 3ft some say 7.5ft. Have you tried a longer cable?
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/26/2010 12:02 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Locking them both to 100BaseT FDX did not fix it
Since
nge
to make the public IP's report properly?
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/25/2010 08:44 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
Another NAT rule, or the one you have is triggering on them too.
What does this look like, /ip firewall nat export
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:36 PM,
Ahh That makes sense for the private IP's, and I'll have to set that
up. But why would the public's, which should not even be touched by
NAT, be showing up as our /30 instead of the actual IP address?
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/25/2010 11
That is what it looks like from the internet side of things.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/25/2010 11:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
But the publics are still being nat'ed?
On Sep 25, 2010 12:39 PM, "Christopher Tyler" wrote:
Sorry about that, my mista
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat\
disabled=no out-interface=WAN src-address=!xxx.xxx.0.0/22
Where xxx is our _public_ IP block.
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
On 09/25/2010 01:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Masquerade the private addre
ns.
No quite sure what I have messed up, but assume this is a simple fix and
I'm just not thinking of it. If you need any further info just let me
know and I'll post it.
--
Christopher Tyler
Total Wireless Communications, LLC
___
Mikrot
29 matches
Mail list logo
