I don't think the 76.77.2.129/28 subnet has been properly routed to
you. You can test this by writing a MASQUERADE rule for all traffic
leaving from your WAN interface. If this brings the network online then
you need to talk to your ISP about getting that block routed properly.
Regards,
Pau
Confirm that your default gateway on your computer is setup and correct,
and that this is the same IP that is on the LAN interface of the
Mikrotik box.
Even if your Masquerade rule was setup wrong you'd still be able to ping
the local public IP of your Mikrotik box.
Regards,
Paul
Chris Got
ite side's network and see what happens.
Regards,
Paul
Mike Hammett wrote:
Where would I see that at?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -----
From: "Paul J. Benner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M
Mike,
Does the IPSec tunnel encrypt any packets when you attempt to make a
connection from one side to the other?
Regards,
Paul
Mike Hammett wrote:
Actually, the darn thing stopped working once it started and without any
changes to either side. :-\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /ip ipsec policy pr
Aaron,
Yes, this card is compatible with RouterOS.
Regards,
Paul
Aaron, Network Administrator, Great Lakes Internet, Inc. wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Does anybody know if the NMP8602-Plus card is compatible with routeros?
http://www.wisp-router.com/wri/itemdesc.asp?ic=NMP8602%2DPlus&eq=&Tp=
Also d
You're right.
The traffic will appear to be coming from the IP address that is in the
same subnet as the router's default route. If you've done this, a
simple reboot might be in order just to square everything off.
Regards,
Paul
ccrum wrote:
It should be based on what your default route i
I really don't think this is possible. Once an interface is made part
of a bridge it stops being it's own unique device and starts being part
of a whole. You can't effect one part of the bridge without the other.
The only possible way to attempt it is to use the V3.0 with this setting:
/int
7 matches
Mail list logo
