I have a Sixxs and a HE tunnel, but have let the HE tunnel go (or something, i
forget, just stopped using it as there was a MT bug that made it hard to keep
working)
https://www.sixxs.net/misc/coolstuff/
Thats the driving stuff of the net right there (information, porn, and
entertainment).
Ive had a few issues off and on, nothing I can point much at. I found moving ssh
off 22 helped pretty much every single place. Now the only time I have any
issues at all, is when my laptop drops the wireless connection.
Tudod Ki wrote:
What problem could cause that SSH just dies...I can only
And I thought I was the only one to hit his mail server with telnet
That smart phone is not so smart half the time. I miss hitting IRC
from telnet, the PONG's kept you awake!
MartÃn @ Ibersystems wrote:
telnet mail.butchevans.com 25
220 mail.butchevans.com ESMTP Postfix
HELO mail.plain.text
802.11 assumed that you would have a AP and a CPE. That the CPE would be a
singular device, thus, only 1 MAC address. Then people made ethernet CPE. They
had to use Proxy ARP to allow more then 1 device live on the ethernet port. Then
people wanted a true bridge, and at the ame time people wanted
I forget the list it was on, but i will look for it, someone did a test and
IIRC (might be faulty memory here) but Star will link to a MT ap, but MT wont
link to a StarAP, and UBNT will link to both. Ubnt will also use compression and
fast frames (etc 11g features) with Star, but not with MT. I
That is in the works.
Robert Andrews wrote:
I would like to also ask if anyone has hacked a linux wireless driver
that I could kibitz on to use 5/10mhz channels...?
Robert
Damian Wallace wrote:
The problem is that is no standard for 5/10 MHz channels. They came
about as a result of a
Its being worked on in the ath5k project, have a look. Its fairly advanced from
my understanding.
Robert Andrews wrote:
If you would like some co-op on that I would be willing
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
That is in the works.
Robert Andrews wrote:
I would like to also ask
Hotspot + client isolation. If I have a AP i need for only specific people then
WPA2+PSK. WPA-TKIP is hackable, WPA2-PSK is not and likely never will be, or,
will be trivial to spot stop.
Butch Evans wrote:
What is your preferred method for securing the wireless portion of your
network
Anyone have a example of how to do recursive nexthop lookups with MT? My BGP
looks to be working in so far as I am able to access the entire announcement
(/22) from my provider but can not reach anything beyond.
___
Mikrotik mailing list
I am pretty sure they are snagging the radio name info from the neighbor
protocol (cdp)
Robert Andrews wrote:
I am of the opinion that their fights with StarOS has soured them on
interoperability. Note that Ubiquiti does show up in the MT AP with
the correct info, so someone has figured it
Its time to pull the trigger and setup some bonded bandwidth. The place
I wish to do this with uses a Csico
at their end running `CEF Per-Packet` and private BGP for line fail-over
detection. Can MT handle the
`CEF per-packet` or will I be needing a Cisco for the handoff.
Do you mean via a VPN (over the internet at each site) or via a physical
point to point network connection? I am guessing a
VPN. A VPN is quick and easy, PPtP works fine. Securing it, OpenVPN or a
plain SSH tunnel. There are many other options
too. What kind of data needs passed between the
Fax: 906-774-0335
ch...@uplogon.com
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Do you mean via a VPN (over the internet at each site) or via a physical
point to point network connection? I am guessing a
VPN. A VPN is quick and easy, PPtP works fine. Securing it, OpenVPN or a
plain SSH tunnel
What is being hacked? If they have any skills at all, they know how to
change a mac address. MAC based block lists do not work for long
Brian Bearce wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to find a hackers MAC address and block all traffic
via the MikroTik. I am running version 2.9.43
Thanks
Ahh. I have people try this. I found the best way to deal with them is
to force all http from them to undesirable places (the rest is blocked
out right). Every now and then one will call me up and explain I was
uh, on your network and all I can get is this goat web site Yea, you
were doing more
Anyone seeing a problem where NS5's in 5/10mhz mode will not see a MT
AP? I have a few dozen NS5's out there
on 20mhz and they work fine. Ive got a 5 and 10mhz MT link (MT at AP + 4
CPE) and went to add a NS5 and its a
no go. NS5 does not see the AP unless I switch to 20mhz. MT is
[EMAIL
16 matches
Mail list logo
