Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-11 Thread james
rotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: 12 November 2010 12:55 AM To: mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit Just to be clear. The throughput of the plain vanilla PCI bus is 133 Mega BYTES/s

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-11 Thread Bill Prince
o:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: 11 November 2010 11:31 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit Pci shouldn't be a problem, but asking 35 megs per radio might be. On Nov 11, 2010 3:26 PM, "james"

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-11 Thread james
discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit Pci shouldn't be a problem, but asking 35 megs per radio might be. On Nov 11, 2010 3:26 PM, "james" wrote: > Hi Josh > > Would a PCI to 4 port mPCI card adapter with 4x Radio's be able to get at > le

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-11 Thread Josh Luthman
nt: 03 November 2010 05:16 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit > > PCI > > Capacity 133 MB <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte>/s (32-bit at 33 MHz) > 266 MB/s (32-bit at 66 MHz or 64-bit at 33 MHz) > 533 MB/s

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-11 Thread james
rotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: 03 November 2010 05:16 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit PCI Capacity 133 MB <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte>/s (32-bit at 33 M

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-03 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:08 -0400, Casey Mills wrote: > Anyone using these? > http://www.roc-noc.com/product.php?productid=55&cat=0&page=1 > > It is getting much harder to find a board with this many PCI slots. > Maybe Mikrotik needs to make a PCI Express card. > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Pro

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-03 Thread Josh Luthman
Message- > > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com > > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Cox > > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:39 AM > > To: Mikrotik discussions > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-03 Thread Casey Mills
-Original Message- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Cox > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:39 AM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit > >

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-03 Thread Paul McCall
Thanks Guys for the suggestions -Original Message- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Cox Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:39 AM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Andrew Cox
I'd recommend this way also (building / buying x86 boxes). There's a good thread on the MT forums from a guy who was quite happily running 10Gbps interfaces on Dell PowerEdge 860's back in v3.X http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19245

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Paul McCall
boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:08 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit I, too, would use x86. I'm not a big fan of "high end" routerboards as they've proven otherwise (RB100 bugs most

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Paul McCall
t: Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit I, too, would use x86. I'm not a big fan of "high end" routerboards as they've proven otherwise (RB100 bugs most recently noted). Buy a good x86 box, stick in an IDE/SATA/CF DOM and you're all set regarding hardware.

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Josh Luthman
I, too, would use x86. I'm not a big fan of "high end" routerboards as they've proven otherwise (RB100 bugs most recently noted). Buy a good x86 box, stick in an IDE/SATA/CF DOM and you're all set regarding hardware. ROS should work flawlessly if you're just breaking out the network to the other

Re: [Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, I would build my own x86 based Mikrotik boxes with as many GigE ports as you need (or use multiple boxes). You can build a much more powerful system for the same or less money than an RB1100. Even the ATOM processor based Supermicro boards have a LOT more horsepower, and some come with t

[Mikrotik] Need to NAT 10 to 15 offices - gigabit

2010-11-02 Thread Paul McCall
We have an office complex where we have wired up 15 offices. Typically, we put in as many RB493s tied together as it takes, with each available port doing NAT/DHCP on a separate network. In this case, we have fiber to the building, and we have gigabit access to Radiological Images, where a series