Anyone had trouble with client to ap same version? I have heard rumors
that they wouldn't associate or pass traffic.
Also, anyone seen any problems with 3.x ap and a 2.9 client? I want to
start upgrading to take advantage of the pseudobridge.
Terri Kelley
Network Engineer
254-697-6710
This
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Terri Kelley wrote:
Anyone had trouble with client to ap same version? I have heard
rumors that they wouldn't associate or pass traffic.
While I have only one customer using 3.7 on both client and AP (that
I know of), I have not seen this issue. Perhaps others have.
Al
Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 4/23/2008 10:07pm
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Terri Kelley wrote:
>Anyone had trouble with client to ap same version? I have heard
>rumors that they wouldn't associate or pass traffic.
That's why I use Tranzeo's for clients.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Barber
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:26 AM
> To: Mikrotik discussions
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
>
&g
ot;Lanham Rattan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
That's why I use Tranzeo's for clients.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrote:
>For allowing the customer to have the IP in their equipment versus
>the radio, is using straight WDS bridge mode still the best way?
WDS is better than "psuedobridge". After all, if you can create a
"real" bridge, isn't that better than a "sort of" (p
Interesting. I had never really looked into wds since I didn't need
all the functions. I guess that and I was used to ethernet and you
just bridged it there which basically equates to pseudobridge.
That and the older cpe's we used you just selected bridge which would
be the equivalent (sort o
hursday, April 24, 2008 6:26 AM
> To: Mikrotik discussions
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
>
>
> For allowing the customer to have the IP in their equipment
> versus the radio, is using straight WDS bridge mode still the best way?
>
> Problem with that, is i
Butch,
I thought that pseudobridge had better performance in p-t-multipoint.
On the Mikrotik forum, I noticed alot of complaining
about WDS performance dropping when you get over 5 or 6 WDS sessions on
an AP. Is this true?
Eric
//
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrot
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Eric Sooter wrote:
I thought that pseudobridge had better performance in
p-t-multipoint. On the Mikrotik forum, I noticed alot of
complaining about WDS performance dropping when you get over 5 or 6
WDS sessions on an AP. Is this true?
Let's say that you have an AP with
-wds, meaning there are now 43 wds links on the AP, is the AP going to
choke?
-Keith-
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 4/30/2008 1:51pm
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Eric Sooter wrote:
>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrote:
>I have an AP (RB600) with about 40 clients and 3 full wds links at
>the moment. We are looking at providing the customer with their IP
>on their own equipment. Station-wds was looking like the answer.
>If all 40 of those clients were in station-wds,
ave to do any NATing above their
router.
-Keith-
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 4/30/2008 3:12pm
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrote:
>I have an AP (RB600) with about 40 cl
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrote:
>Right, which we'll have a fair split of customer's that don't have
>publics running in plain station mode. But in some of the business
>districts about 90% of those clients are going to be putting the
>public IP into their equipment, with the ap as the
I tend to look at this as if it were ethernet, right or wrong. Most of
my customers that need a public ip for a specific reason I would
rather pseudobridge as if it were a bridge on an ethernet or cable
system. This helps me so that I don't have to mess with port
forwarding etc for special
15 matches
Mail list logo
