From: "Nathan Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> or 6 slaves that are busy. I guess my question is why is my load so
>> high if I am only processing 5 or 6 mails at a time?
[...Snip...]
>1. /var/spool/MIMEDefang is on a RAM Disk
>2. I am using the Perl interpreter
>3. Only messages smaller than 100
On 27 Jul 2004 at 0:30, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Every day you come up with a way to block charsets you don't want, and
> someone makes a better idiot. So here's the next "problem". How do I
> scan and properly block these? Notice the 'big5' charset
>
> Subject:
> =?big5?Q?=A7=D6=A8=D3=B3=F
One of my customers wants to replace all attachs in internal mail (the
sender and all the recipients are in the local domain) greather than
300k with a link to the internal webserver, in order to save diskspace
in the mail server.
I think I can do that with replace_with_url, I was thinking somethi
> From: Vivek Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ITs true that I have another Virus Scanner (Vexira). I was working on
> chaing the flow but it will take some time and I wanted to fix the
> current issue as its becoming more annoying.
If the problem is spam you could create a custom rule that gave
ITs true that I have another Virus Scanner (Vexira). I was working on
chaing the flow but it will take some time and I wanted to fix the
current issue as its becoming more annoying.
I think that as all the mails are coming to my server either from
internet (outside) or from exchangeserver its alway
> From: Vivek Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I forgot to mention in my previous mail that I have added
> following code
> in mimedefang-filter:
>
> sub filter_relay($$$){
> my ($hostip,$hostname,$helo) = @_;
> my $internal_net1 = "191.0.0";
> my $internal_net2 = "191.0.1";
> $
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/27/2004 03:12:40
PM:
> This is a serious concern that all the internal mail are checked for
> SPAM and many of them are blocked and put in spamdrop account. I have
> posted this earlier also but it seems that the fixes didn't work. Kindly
> let me know if there is so
Personally,
I would still filter internal email just like external email (virus, file
attachments, spam). You cant trust anyone!
File attachment violations and virus issues are rare since it is strict
policy. Spam can cause some issues. For that, just do an internal ip match
in the spamassas
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> sub filter_relay($$$){
Are you using the "-r" option with mimedefang? Otherwise, filter_relay
never gets called.
--
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[E
--On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:16 PM -0400 Vivek Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to mention in my previous mail that I have added following code
in mimedefang-filter:
sub filter_relay($$$){
my ($hostip,$hostname,$helo) = @_;
my $internal_net1 = "191.0.0";
my $internal_net2 = "
Hi,
I forgot to mention in my previous mail that I have added following code
in mimedefang-filter:
sub filter_relay($$$){
my ($hostip,$hostname,$helo) = @_;
my $internal_net1 = "191.0.0";
my $internal_net2 = "191.0.1";
$hostip=~ /^(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)./ ;
my $mailip = $1;
if($mailip eq $i
Hi all,
This is a serious concern that all the internal mail are checked for
SPAM and many of them are blocked and put in spamdrop account. I have
posted this earlier also but it seems that the fixes didn't work. Kindly
let me know if there is something we can do about it.
Please help...
Thanks
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Chris Masters wrote:
> Is it safe to ditch calls to message_contains_virus_*
> from filter_begin and *only* use
> entity_contains_virus_* from filter.
For now.
However, the entity_contains_virus_* functions are deprecated, and may
be removed from a future version of MIMEDefa
Hi All,
Is it safe to ditch calls to message_contains_virus_*
from filter_begin and *only* use
entity_contains_virus_* from filter.
After all the message_contains_virus functions just
recurse through the 'Work' directory anyway.
Just checking I'm not missing something here.
Thanks, Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Yanick Quirion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Could you tell me where I have to put these lines into
> mimedefang-filter
> file? The relay server has always the same address; it's my exchange
> server that is behind sendmail.
Just before you call SpamAssassin.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Tomas Kopal wrote:
> The attached patch adds more error reporting for easier diagnoists. Hope
> you find it useful.
Thank you! I have applied it and it will appear in 2.45.
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
Hi there,
I just recently upgraded mimedefang and I have run into problems, after
few hours of work identified as wrong permisions on files passed for
scanning.
But during the troubleshooting, I noticed that currently there is no
checking for error returned by clamd in message_contains_virus_cla
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Ole Craig wrote:
> Is it possible to create the /etc/mail/mimedefang-ip-key after
> the install process?
Yes; use the "gen-ip-validator.pl" script distributed in the tarball.
perl gen-ip-validator.pl > /etc/mail/mimedefang-ip-key
chown defang /etc/mail/
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Matt Selsky wrote:
> Jul 27 09:12:20 clover mimedefang[22489]: [ID 649295 mail.info]
> MIMEDefang-2.44: mi_stop=1
This is normal.
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Nathan Martinez wrote:
> 1. /var/spool/MIMEDefang is on a RAM Disk
> 2. I am using the Perl interpreter
> 3. Only messages smaller than 100KB are being passed to SA
> Any more ideas?
Nope! If you strace the process that's using all the CPU, what is
it doing?
Regards,
David
>> or 6 slaves that are busy. I guess my question is why is my load so
>> high if I am only processing 5 or 6 mails at a time?
>Impossible to tell. Is /var/spool/MIMEDefang on a RAM Disk?
>Are you using the embedded Perl interpreter? What's the maximum size
>of message that you're passing to S
Hi,
> return if ($RelayAddr eq "172.16.2.7");
>
> return if ($RelayAddr eq "127.0.0.1");
>
Could you tell me where I have to put these lines into mimedefang-filter
file? The relay server has always the same address; it's my exchange
server that is behind sendmail.
Thank you
Yanick
__
We're running MIMEDefang 2.44 with Sendmail 8.13.0 on Solaris 9. When I
stop MIMEDefang via '/etc/init.d/mimedefang stop' I get the following
message in syslog:
Jul 27 09:12:20 clover mimedefang[22489]: [ID 649295 mail.info] MIMEDefang-2.44:
mi_stop=1
This message comes from the sendmail sour
Is it possible to create the /etc/mail/mimedefang-ip-key after
the install process?
Does it have to have a specific format, or can I just stick a
random string into the file and start using
[add|delete]_ip_validation_header()?
Thanks,
Ole
--
Ole Craig *
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:07:52 +0530, Ravi.P CMC Engr wrote:
> Can you please provide me the steps in order to split the DB to
> avoid such problem in future.
Splitting the database will not avoid problems that comes from bugs or errors in the
database or serializing modules. The reason split t
--On Monday, July 26, 2004 2:47 PM -0500 Mike Campbell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't think of any reason why I would want to run spamassassign against
outgoing emails. If I am wrong somebody please let me know what I am
missing.
If "outgoing" includes smtp relay service (and thus "incoming
26 matches
Mail list logo
