On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Rolf wrote:
[calls action_add_part]
yet there is no part added to any of the files in the relevant
qdir-d-a-t-e-ti.me.-001/
Presumably by design, but how can I include the SA report there?
my $qdir = get_quarantine_dir();
if (open(SAREPORT, $qdir/SA-REPORT.TXT))
Hi!
I occasionally (5% chance maybe?) see the following in my maillog:
Nov 23 13:11:29 hostname mimedefang-multiplexor[22828]: Slave 0 stderr:
invalid rule: MAILER_ACC
It doesn't seem to hinder MIMEDefang to do its work properly, but I wonder
if I could get rid of it somehow. I'm currently
Jurgen Botz wrote:
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I saw that discussion, but my
problem seems to be different. I didn't see the same symptoms of
the defang process being restarted quickly, for example, and there
definitely seems to be a connection to this error:
Nov 22 09:33:54 kahuna
Rolf wrote:
hello
Try as I might I cannot add the spamassassin report to the mail msg
prior to it being quarantined.
[snip]
# If you find the SA report useful, add it, I guess...
action_add_part($entity, text/plain, -suggest,
On 11/17/2004 11:14, Raphael Pennisi wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if someone have never tried to use mimedefang with
the new sendmail project (SMX), or if the libpmilter (policy milter) provided
is somehow similar to the libmilter.
I don't think the policy milter is the same thing.
I had the effect you mentioned when my mimedefang-filter was temporarely
broken due to a missing bracket. (Re)assure yours isn't:
mimedefang.pl -test
Dave
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Yanick Quirion wrote:
mimedefang-multiplexor[1843]: Starting slave 9 (pid 26747) (10 running):
About to execute command 'relayok 66.192.85.201
66-192-85-201.gen.twtelecom.net '
That's perfectly normal; check the mimedefang-multiplexor source code.
Regards,
David.
Howdy,
This may or may not be a MD problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bayes_* tag.. some do, some don't. I'm
running SA
Howdy,
This may or may not be a MD problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bayes_* tag.. some do, some don't. I'm
running SA
Sorry, my apologies for the multiple postings.
-adam
-
laughter is like music
on 11/23/2004 9:30 AM Adam Beatham said the following:
Howdy,
This may or may not be a MD problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Adam Beatham wrote:
This may or may not be a MD problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bayes_* tag..
Unfortunately, there is nothing that is just jumping out at me.
permissions are fine, nothing noticeable in the logs. and the strangest
piece is that it stamps some, but not others..
I tested with a couple pieces of mail that had no BAYES_* test/score in
the headers, and ran it through
I asked a while back and didn't see an answer... how often do people like to
reinit their bayes databases??
-Ben
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Adam Beatham wrote:
Unfortunately, there is nothing that is just jumping out at me.
permissions are fine, nothing noticeable in the logs. and the strangest
piece is that it stamps some, but not others..
I tested with a couple pieces of mail that had no BAYES_*
It's a site-wide implementation, that I've had for atleast the last 18
or so months, without any noticeable problems. I have a feeling it
occured when I upgraded to 3.0.1, but I can't pinpoint it. I'm just at
a loss as to whats going on..
I did search for any other bayes_* files, just to make
15 matches
Mail list logo