The code was:
if (stream_by_recipient())
{
return;
}
The mail should be going out, just more slowly. :-) You should see
a lot of queue files in your clientmqueue directory, which will all
be delivered at the next clientmqueue run.
The interesting thing was that nothing was getting
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:56:42 -0500 (CDT), Ian Mitchell wrote
>
> The only thing I can figure that makes me questionable is that the
> outbound email server for a company does not nessassarily have to
> have an MX record in DNS, so detecting if it's legit could be difficult.
And in many cases th
You can whitelist users or entire domains from the rDNS check in your access
file using Niel's hack.
I would rather whitelist a single domain than turn it off entirely if you had
been using it since december with only a little fallout.
Add:
rdns:1.2.3.4 OK
rdns:@somehost.com OK
to whiteli
I've got the following working to modify INPUTMSG prior to calling
SpamAssassin so I can add headers that then trigger SA rules. Just
wondering if anyone has any input on a "prettier" way to do it.
KAM
sub append_header_immediately {
#IN ORDER TO HAVE A HEADER TEST IN SPAMASSASSIN REACT TO DA
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:21:23PM -0400, Rich West wrote:
> Personally, we've looked in to it. We tend to agree that AOL's position
> is somewhat aggressive since their techs are usually behind the time and
We've found it highly effective when combined with other RFC related
checks. No RDNS w
Hi,
PS: Oh, you want the ANSWER? :-) Read the mimedefang-filter man
page, especially the MAINTAINING STATE section.
RFTM MAINTAINING STATE section did help :-) Thanks !
Martin
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing
Martin Blapp wrote:
> If I try to save the relay-address and a flag in filter_sender() or
> filter_recipient() I often get wrong entries in filter_begin()
> from a previous scan. [...]
> Do you know why this happens ?
Yes.
Regards,
David.
PS: Oh, you want the ANSWER? :-) Read the mimedefang
Hi David,
If I try to save the relay-address and a flag in filter_sender() or
filter_recipient() I often get wrong entries in filter_begin()
from a previous scan. For the IP I work around this problem
with reading again the COMMANDS file
Do you know why this happens ?
Martin
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL
Ok, when running a domain one must have certian email addresses that are
just unavoidable, perhaps the technical contact email for your DNS
provider? Ones which can be scooped up through email harvesting. While I
know this technique is old, I think I've thought up an idea on how to
combat it.
A l
Rich West wrote:
Personally, we've looked in to it. We tend to agree that AOL's position
is somewhat aggressive since their techs are usually behind the time and
don't support their own new technologies well. But, political opinions
aside, we were leary about implementing it because, frankly,
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:27 PM -0400 Rich West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Anyone care to post a "strict" version of their filter as an example? :-)
You should be able to add "use strict;" at the top of the file and then run
"mimedefang.pl -test". I got a warning for a missing "my" for $Vir
Personally, we've looked in to it. We tend to agree that AOL's position
is somewhat aggressive since their techs are usually behind the time and
don't support their own new technologies well. But, political opinions
aside, we were leary about implementing it because, frankly, we were
afraid o
Anyone care to post a "strict" version of their filter as an example? :-)
-Rich
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimede
We have a server that has Mailman running on it for close to 80 lists,
and, on that same server, we have our
sendmail+mimedefang+File::Scan+Anomy mail server. Mailman sends its
mail out locally to the sendmail server (not utilizing VERP as that
caused us a world of other problems in the past),
Rich West wrote:
> Quite suddenly, emails FROM the mailman server were not going out.
> After a frazzling hour, it was discovered that a section of code in the
> mimedefang filter was causing the problem, although the piece of code
> was in place for well over a month. Commenting it out and rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
> I've installed mimedefang-2.51 along with clamav-0.84rc1, and trying
> initiate a sendmail session by telneting to localhost, I get the
>
> 451 4.3.0 Problem running virus-scanner
>
> everytime I try wither clamd or clamav-milter is running, any thoughts
>
Hi there,
I've installed mimedefang-2.51 along with clamav-0.84rc1, and trying
initiate a sendmail session by telneting to localhost, I get the
451 4.3.0 Problem running virus-scanner
everytime I try wither clamd or clamav-milter is running, any thoughts
what's causing this?
thanks!
Ran.
_
Hello all, this is a bit off topic but relevant.
We finally decided it was probably time to implement AOL style reverse DNS
checks into our MTA. Since AOL has been doing it now for something like 6
months it is a pretty fair bet that most US customers that are legit have
corrected their DNS issues
18 matches
Mail list logo
