Albert Croft wrote:
> Downgraded Mail::Tools to v. 1.15, and no joy-it occurred again.
What's the output of:
mimedefang.pl -features
on the machine in question?
Seeing "-odd" -related messages means mimedefang.pl is having
trouble re-mailing messages. Could you post some complete log
e
Albert Croft wrote:
It was a fresh load of a machine-the configuration was adapted from
one that was older, though.
Mail::Tools 1.67 is installed. Do I maybe need to drop back to the
1.15 (or earlier 1.1401) version?
-Albert C.
Downgraded Mail::Tools to v. 1.15, and no joy-it occurred
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:13:08AM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> This is indeed a problem. What we did in CanIt was separate out the
> "facts" from the "policy".
>
> So the "facts" modules might say:
>
> - User [EMAIL PROTECTED] is whitelisted.
> - Domain foo.com is blacklisted.
> - Message con
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> >So, I split up the mimedefang config file into a parts directory:
>
> But it doesn't:
>
> 1. Make it easy to unit test your functionality.
>
> be a fairly time consuming process. So it would be nice to have a
> way to unit
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:36:22AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> Ditch mimedefang-filter. Have mimedefang.pl use something like
> Module::Pluggable to find everything in the MimeDefang::Filter::Plugin
> namespace.
>
> Then have every filter_* subroutine in mimedefang-filter be something like:
Hm
Today's Topics:
4. Re: Odd error messages filling up logfiles in new deployment (MD
2.49 or 2.51) (James Ebright)
--
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:11:44 -0400
From: "James Ebright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] O
--On Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:24 PM -0500 Charles Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
You have to remember that using the term spam to refer to unwanted email
and ham to refer to wanted email is basically a put-down of the Hormel
product SPAM. It is clear that the email term is a reference to the
Matthew,
Thank you for sharing this. It is about time more
people get involved in this growing and out of control
menace to Internet society.
Curtis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/05/zombies.htm
>
> "
> ... will send letters to more than 3,000 ISPs around
> the worl
You have to remember that using the term spam to refer to unwanted email
and ham to refer to wanted email is basically a put-down of the Hormel
product SPAM. It is clear that the email term is a reference to their
product, not an independently arrived at term.
To Hormel this is a severe threa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/05/zombies.htm
"
... will send letters to more than 3,000 ISPs around the world, urging them to
employ protective measures to prevent their customers' computers from being
hijacked by spammers. The measures include:
* blocking a common
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About time, too...
As a sidenote: They should also be writing a letter to Mr. Bill (Oo Noo)
asking his darn company to stop writing so many darn bugs into the OS.
We just all want to be free... IE/Outlook free that is. ;)
-Ben
p.s. I think we need a new bum
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/05/zombies.htm
"
... will send letters to more than 3,000 ISPs around the world, urging them to
employ protective measures to prevent their customers' computers from being
hijacked by spammers. The measures include:
* blocking a common Internet port used for e-ma
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:37:05PM -0800, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> newaliases stores the keys (and values) with a trailing \0 character. Try:
>
> print $aliases{"root\0"}, "\n";
>
> Also make sure to strip the \0 from the value if you're using it for
> anything
On Tue, 24 May 2005 13:29:49 -0500, Albert Croft wrote
> I have tried both mimedefang 2.51 and 2.49, to the same effect. The
> new machine is running SpamAssassin 3.03 and sendmail 8.13.1 under
> CentOS
> 4.0, with Milter.LogLevel=0 and LogLevel=9, and was adapted from a
> working gateway usin
Ian Mitchell wrote:
Always curious how someone who owns a trademark feels when they're
trademark is essentially hijacked by a community as a whole for use to
describe the bain of all existance ;)
Yeah. When you think about it, Kleenex, Xerox, and Styrofoam have had
it *easy*.
--
Kelson Vibb
Just configured a new machine to act as a filter gateway to replace the
current, underpowered machine, and encountering an error I do not
understand that is at times filling up the log files. The entries have
the following appearance:
May 24 12:52:30 spam1b mimedefang-multiplexor[20618]: Slave
According to Hormel, the usage of "spam" as a term to identify Unsolicited
Commercial Email (UCE) is ok. However, it should not be confused with the
term "SPAM" which is a registered trademark of the SPAM lunchmeat product
they offer.
Here's a link. http://www.spam.com/ci/ci_in.htm
Always curiou
This refers to thier meat byproduct in a can and is in all caps (SPAM), when
referring to UCE you should only cap the first letter or do it in all lower
case.
And yes, SPAM (c)Hormel way pre-dates even ARPANET and Hormel does defend
their trademark fairly religiously (and they should).
Jim
On
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
The wonderful world of software patents and trademarks
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=76586902
Now time to avoid to offer "anti-spam" solutions / software :} Hormel
could that treat hostile.
I don't think it could apply to the industry we use it
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:37:05PM -0800, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> However if I try to pull out a specific value with:
>
> require DB_File;
> use Fcntl;
> tie %aliases, "DB_File", "/etc/mail/aliases.db", O_RDONLY;
>
> print $aliases{root};
>
> It doesn't work. If I use `makemap hash aliases
20 matches
Mail list logo
