Re: [Mimedefang]local socket name/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock'unsafe

2005-06-09 Thread John Nemeth
On Oct 25, 5:00pm, Rob MacGregor wrote: } On 04/06/05, Nauman Habib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } } I setted up a Mail server 2 days ago . It is sending and receving mails with } out any problem , but it seams that MIMEDefang is not working at all - Mail } log return these errors : } }

Re: [Mimedefang] Email Filtering Article

2005-06-09 Thread MC
Paul Whittney wrote: Most likely people here read slashdot at times (or all the time ;-), but there is an article on filtering email, with graphs, and other ideas. http://www.acme.com/mail_filtering/ Be warned, he doesn't like perl, so I bet he's never tried MIMEdefang, and I don't quite agree

[Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread dead hero
hey, i've made a little addition to the filter_begin code in the mimedefang-filter script --- background: lets say i provide a free webmail service and i use mimedefang + spamassassin to scan outgoing emails. problem: people who are sending mails to hotmal.com instade of hotmail.com or to

Re: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread Guido
On Thursday 09 June 2005 11:49, dead hero wrote: code: sub filter_begin() { foreach $recip (@Recipients) { if ($recip =~ /\.+\@(.+)\/) { $domain = $1; @mx = mx($domain); unless (@mx) { delete_recipient($recip); } } } } - i was wondering if there are

Re: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread dead hero
--- Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) MX records are not required, when non-existant the A record will be used. are you sure about that? i think you must have a MX record, what do you mean 'the A record', which A record? there could be lots of them. for exemple, i'm sending an email to

Re: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread David F. Skoll
dead hero wrote: 1) MX records are not required, when non-existant the A record will be used. are you sure about that? He's right. Check the RFCs. Also, your code will block mail if there's a temporary DNS error. You should distinguish between SERVFAIL and NXDOMAIN status codes from the DNS

[Mimedefang] file descriptor warning

2005-06-09 Thread Chris Masters
Hi All, Tried to search for the answer to this but the archives don't reveal the answer but I know I've read some similar posts this year ;) If I use Net::LDAP at the top of mimedefang-filter I see the file descriptor WARNING message: Something in your Perl filter appears to have opened a file

RE: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread Damrose, Mark
-Original Message- From: Kevin A. McGrail Minor nit. If I have a zone like this: imacompany.com86400INA1.2.3.4 imacompany.com86400INMX51.2.3.5 mx1.imacompany.com86400INA1.2.3.5 Then 1.2.3.5 is the only MX destination and

Re: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Sorry, Mark's small change is correct. I meant to type in the MX record name but forgot and type the IP address. imacompany.com.86400INA1.2.3.4 imacompany.com.86400INMX5mx1.imacompany.com. mx1.imacompany.com.86400INA1.2.3.5

RE: [Mimedefang] suggestion - filter_begin

2005-06-09 Thread Sleeuwenhoek J.
hey, i've made a little addition to the filter_begin code in the mimedefang-filter script ---snip--- code: sub filter_begin() { foreach $recip (@Recipients) { if ($recip =~ /\.+\@(.+)\/) { $domain = $1; @mx = mx($domain); unless (@mx) {

Re: [Mimedefang] file descriptor warning

2005-06-09 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, June 09, 2005 7:03 AM -0700 Chris Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I use Net::LDAP at the top of mimedefang-filter I see the file descriptor WARNING message: Something in your Perl filter appears to have opened a file descriptor I guess Net::LDAP is doing something

Re: [Mimedefang] interaction between sendmail 'access' check and MdF's milter checks

2005-06-09 Thread Mike Atkinson
Gary Funck wrote: $ makemap -u hash access.db | grep 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.4 REJECT Entries in the access map should be tagged, try: Connect:1.2.3.4 REJECT -- Mike Atkinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and

RE: [Mimedefang] interaction between sendmail 'access' check andMdF's milter checks

2005-06-09 Thread Gary Funck
-Original Message- From: Mike Atkinson Gary Funck wrote: $ makemap -u hash access.db | grep 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.4 REJECT Entries in the access map should be tagged, try: Connect:1.2.3.4 REJECT Maybe that's it, but I've got a gazillion IP addresses listed without a tage