David F. Skoll wrote:
Marco Berizzi wrote:
The last row is action_change_header(Precedence, bulk);
Hmmm... That should work. It eventually boils down to a
smfi_chgheader call into libmilter that looks like this:
smfi_chgheader(ctx, Precedence, 1, bulk);
And according to
Marco Berizzi wrote:
Strange
Are you sure your action_change_header is always being executed? Could
you call md_syslog right after the action_change_header call to make
sure it is running?
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
David F. Skoll wrote:
Marco Berizzi wrote:
Strange
yes. It did work with some old MD releases (I don't remember which).
Are you sure your action_change_header is always being executed? Could
you call md_syslog right after the action_change_header call to make
sure it is running?
Marco Berizzi wrote:
yes. It did work with some old MD releases (I don't remember which).
Weird. I just tried with MD 2.54 and Sendmail 8.12.10 and it worked fine.
???
Regards,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
Marco,
I'm wondering if Sendmail treats the Precedence: header specially.
Could you try adding a different header?
action_change_header('X-My-Custom-Header', 'For testing!');
If that works, then obviously Sendmail doesn't like milters to
change the Precedence: header for some reason.
David F. Skoll wrote:
Marco,
I'm wondering if Sendmail treats the Precedence: header specially.
Could you try adding a different header?
action_change_header('X-My-Custom-Header', 'For testing!');
If that works, then obviously Sendmail doesn't like milters to
change the Precedence:
One of my clients has 40+ email accounts. At the gateway I'm runing
sendmail 8.13.3 and mimedefang 2.54 on FreeBSD 5.4-p8. The gateway is a
Pentium III 700MHz qith 512MB RAM. For such a small system it was more than
enough.
It worked flawlessly until the last version of sober hit it a couple
Fernando Gleiser wrote:
It worked flawlessly until the last version of sober hit it a couple of
days ago. Since then that piece of cr*p is hitting it with bursts
where the server gets 60+ mails in less than 10seconds, so MD runs out
of slaves.
You might want to set the ConnectionRateThrottle
is that's what seems to be crapping on the net lately.
I got few of those - but not too many...
Interesting notes... thanks..
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.benjammin.net/
version:2.1
I am running Fedora Core 4 with Sendmail 8.13.4 (plain
vanilla install). I was following the documentation
by Mickey Hill, but have run into a problem. Whenever
I run make to create mimedefang, I get the following
errors:
mimedefang.c: In function 'rcptto':
mimedefang.c:907: warning: pointer
Harley Race wrote:
mimedefang.c: In function 'rcptto':
mimedefang.c:907: warning: pointer targets in passing
argument 2 of 'writestr' differ in signedness
All of those warnings are harmless. I guess I should fix
them, though. For now, you should be able to run MIMEDefang
without any
--On Friday, November 25, 2005 12:43 PM -0500 David F. Skoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can use Sendmail 8.13's more fine-grained rate_control features so
that any one IP address can't open too many connections too quickly.
Nice, but note that it's FEATURE(ratecontrol). Look for that in
Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
I always compilled my installations of mimedefang and now
I'm trying the .rpm version of mimedefang.
I wonder if I need to include:
$Feature{'Virus:CLAMD'} = 1;
At the top of my filter in order to MD detect clamAV or will
it detect automatically?
In the case of
--On Friday, November 25, 2005 4:32 PM -0500 Kris Deugau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of a third-party .rpm, probably. Most packages are built in
such a way that the configure script doesn't pick up quite a few things
- antivirus programs among them.
Even if you build the RPM
Hi Kris,
my bad, I had a typo. If I use this line in my filter(near the top):
$Features{'Virus:CLAMD'} = 1;
MD uses clamd as spected.
Thanks
Oliver
Kris Deugau wrote:
Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
I always compilled my installations of mimedefang and now
I'm trying the .rpm version of
Hi Kenneth,
do you run your clamd with user clamav or user defang?
I had to run clamd with user defang in order to allow MD to access
the socket. Maybe there is a better solution.
My filter is finally using clamd, now I want to tweak the installation.
Thanks
Oliver
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:58:25AM -0600, Ben Kamen wrote:
is that's what seems to be crapping on the net lately.
I got few of those - but not too many...
Not too many??? Wow. We just put our cricket graphs publicly online that
show the number of received virusses per second, just to show the
David F. Skoll wrote:
Fernando Gleiser wrote:
It worked flawlessly until the last version of sober hit it a couple of
days ago. Since then that piece of cr*p is hitting it with bursts
where the server gets 60+ mails in less than 10seconds, so MD runs out
of slaves.
You might want to set the
18 matches
Mail list logo
