- Forwarded message from Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:42:27 -0400
From: Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Should I try to do MIMEDefang with Mailscanner
forbackup MX
To:
Running gentoo linux
sendmail 8.13.6
Just getting started with mimedefang and what brought me to it was
something simpler than complex defanging.
I'm on a single user machine and want to debug my mail setup. Certain
mail leaves but never appears at its destination. It is not being
rejected at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I just ignore all the sub funcs in mimedefang-filter or make
them return immediately and get on to the `fiter_end' function where
I can hopefully insert some simple code to create and deposit a copy.
Use the following four-line filter file:
# CUT HERE
MIMEDefang is written for people WHO KNOW PERL! That's the
whole point of the program.
If it makes you feel any better, MIMEDefang was THE motivation for me to sit
down and learn Perl David ;). What I particularly like about MIMEDefang, is
the mere basic level of Perl I need to know to do
Stefan Schoeman wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, MIMEDefang was THE motivation for me to
sit down and learn Perl David ;). What I particularly like about
MIMEDefang, is the mere basic level of Perl I need to know to do pretty
amazing things with mail.
That does make me feel better.
David F. Skoll wrote:
And as a colleague so tactfully pointed out, people who _really_ know
Perl would probably be quite horrified by the MIMEDefang code... :-)
I regularly horrify *myself* with code I wrote six months ago.
What was I smoking, and where can I get a fresh supply?!?
-kgd
Kris Deugau wrote:
I regularly horrify *myself* with code I wrote six months ago.
What was I smoking, and where can I get a fresh supply?!?
Don't worry - I've seen expert PERL programmers horrified by code they wrote 3
weeks prior...
PERL is just like that.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:40 -0500, Ben Kamen wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
I regularly horrify *myself* with code I wrote six months ago.
What was I smoking, and where can I get a fresh supply?!?
Don't worry - I've seen expert PERL programmers horrified by code they wrote
3
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:54:26PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
And as a colleague so tactfully pointed out, people who _really_ know
Perl would probably be quite horrified by the MIMEDefang code... :-)
Nonsense. While MIMEDefang probably wouldn't get a very high Kwalitee
rating or whatever
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:01:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on a single user machine and want to debug my mail setup. Certain
mail leaves but never appears at its destination. It is not being
rejected at my local MTA level nor my ISP smart host.
I don't have any say on ISP
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:01:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on a single user machine and want to debug my mail
setup. Certain
mail leaves but never appears at its destination. It is not being
rejected at my local MTA level nor my ISP smart host.
I don't have any say on
Hi all,
I'm getting a lot of this kind of messages:
MD 2.56
Sendmail 8.13.5
SA 3.1.3
Perl 5.8.6
Jun 23 00:00:04 host2 mimedefang[95658]: MIMEDefang-2.54: accept()
returned invalid socket (Result too large), try again
Jun 23 00:00:04 host2 sm-mta[74578]:
On 06/23/06 at 20:44, 'twas brillig and Stefan Schoeman scrobe:
MIMEDefang is written for people WHO KNOW PERL! That's the
whole point of the program.
If it makes you feel any better, MIMEDefang was THE motivation for me to sit
down and learn Perl David ;).
aol Me too! /aol
(Well, OK,
David F. Skoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I just ignore all the sub funcs in mimedefang-filter or make
them return immediately and get on to the `fiter_end' function where
I can hopefully insert some simple code to create and deposit a copy.
Use the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 23 00:00:04 host2 mimedefang[95658]: MIMEDefang-2.54: accept()
returned invalid socket (Result too large), try again
This means that the accept() system call returned a file descriptor
that is larger than FD_SETSIZE. This means you have (for some reason)
lots and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sub filter_end {
add_recipient('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
}
1;
That does look simple but what happens to the rest of
/etc/mail/mimedefang-filter or do you mean that those four lines is
mimedefang-filter
Those four lines are enough. If the rest of the callbacks are
Paul Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to see *EXACTLY* what this mail contains as it leaves my mta.
I want a copy of my test mails dropped somewhere just as they appear
going to smarthost hub.
Run MIMEDefang with the -d switch, which leaves the spool directory intact.
Your mail
Steve Campbell said the following on 6/23/06 1:42 AM:
I'm getting the feeling that I am not using sendmail properly with regards to
mail accounts. Right now, whenever I need a new mail account, I just create a
new user on the box. Imap and pop accounts are then available when needed. I
dont add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve,
Steve Campbell wrote:
...snip...
Why don't you just use sendmail to trow them away? As others already
pointed that out, you could provision your primary access database(s) to
the secondary (or make the secondary use the primary's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atanas wrote:
...snip...
I primarily deal with non-standard sendmail setups hosting virtual
domains (e.g. multiple mailboxes and multiple domains per single user)
via local delivery agent (LDA) like procmail and maildrop, where
sendmail acts as
20 matches
Mail list logo
