-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, David F. Skoll wrote:
In one sense, it will work. However, in a very important sense, it will
fail miserably. Most senders don't have a clue how to interpret a DSN,
! This is very true !
Even people, who - you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
tagged and recipient B wants spam rejected, then we reject the message
with Recipient B thinks this is spam (message was delivered to other
recipients) then in filter_end we queue the message for
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:36:43PM -0900, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
A fourth option is to introduce a spam folder, where you file
suspected spams. We already use this currently. Then if you cannot
reject an email for one user (because another user does want to
receive the email), flag the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:05:21PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:36 PM -0900 Matthew Schumacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't work because most of the people using the mail system use
POP3. I would love for people to ditch pop3, but due to poor
Am Mittwoch Januar 24 2007 11:04 schrieb Jan-Pieter Cornet:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap,
right, give new config in their clients :-)
and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:24:53PM -0800, David Reta wrote:
I am having an issue with some spam slipping through. When I check the
MSG.0 file from the quarantine against a manual run of the
ENTIRE_MESSAGE file from the quarantine there are rules that are not
hit. I am running them manually as
On 1/24/07, Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
Outlook Express has had IMAP support since at least
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, David Reta wrote:
I am having an issue with some spam slipping through. When I check
the MSG.0 file from the quarantine against a manual run of the
ENTIRE_MESSAGE file from the quarantine there are rules that are not
hit. I am running them manually as the same user as
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
I've use Outlook Express on a daily basis for many years (8+ I'm thinking)
using only IMAP protocol. It's got
Jan-Pieter Cornet spake the following on 1/24/2007 2:04 AM:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:05:21PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:36 PM -0900 Matthew Schumacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't work because most of the people using the mail system use
POP3.
I don't know if I can bring myself to do that, occasionally
we have problems with false positives, so silently dropping
mail would seriously aggravate the issue. People around
here depend on the bounce messages.
I'm sure we have false-positives, and misaddresses email,
etc. But, the number
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 1/24/07, Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
Outlook Express has had IMAP
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
Outlook Express has had IMAP support since at least v4.
Yea, and it's terrible.
I concurr.
And the problems outlook has with IMAP people
attribute to IMAP...
When I was on the IMAP mailing list..
several people brought up those kinds of issues with some
amount of
Ben Kamen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MS's lack of adherence to the protocol.
To bring this closer to Mimedefang, let's look at MS's adherence to
the smtp protocol.
Outlook, under some circumstance, understands a 550 permanent error to
mean try again forever. At the present time we have a
Thanks for the help. The output of the following two commands is
matching up.
Spamassassin -p /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf ENTIRE_MESSAGE
Spamassassin -p /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
ENTIRE_MESSAGE.
The 2 files are linked, also local.cf is linked to
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:27:31AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
Not only that, if a large ISP switches from POP3 to IMAP, they'll suddenly
have to buy terabytes of storage...
Hmm... so how did you know that I got the bill
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:41:58AM -0900, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
IMAP customers, but I'm still not entirely sure how to pass a flag
to mail.local to _one specific_ recipient from within MIMEDefang.
And because of privacy, you can't have a header this should go into
joe's spambox, of
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:36:59AM -0900, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
[customize 550 reject message after data to specify which user
was accepted and which wasn't]
Do you think this will work?
In one sense, it will work. However, in a very important sense, it will
fail miserably.
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Why support a free protocol with a quality implementation when you can
*sell* them your proprietary alternative?! (Ie. Exchange.)
The IMAP mail list has eluded to the same thing.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
19 matches
Mail list logo
