On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:53:41 -0700
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Which is definitely your prerogative. But if the software contains
> community contributed enhancements, fixes, etc. is that a reasonable
> decision to make unilaterally?
I do not care if it's reasonable or not. I am the malevolent
On Feb 8, 2014, at 8:33 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> I'm certainly not a fan of the "walled garden" which is a
>> major reason why I have an Android phone, but I'm pretty sure that
>> ship has sailed.
>
> That's fine. Then what I'm doing is a quixotic indication of my core
> values.
Whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, David F. Skoll wrote:
downside is that it doesn't keep a running hourly sum, but resets
(more-or-less) once an hour so a sender can actually exceed the rate
limit for a while if the timing window is just right. In practice,
V
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:08:38 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > what would be a good way to implement rate-limiting for outbound
> > mails per sender e.g. 50 recipients per smtp_auth sender per hour?
> I do this in filter_begin. There I detect the sender, assign a
> "SenderID" based on differ
4 matches
Mail list logo
