Re: [Mimedefang] adding a new attachment or duplicating the existing attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Michael Lazar wrote: Is there a way to add a new (additional) attachment to an email? Is there a way to duplicate an attachment and re-attach it to the same email? see action_add_part in man mimedefang-filter - -- Steffen Ka

Re: [Mimedefang] md_syslog not working Mimedefang 2.71

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Jon Rowlan wrote: I get basic mail.log logging ok, just not the md_syslog extra detail which is why I raised logging level for Milters and sendmail. md_syslog() submits the logs to the syslog demon directly, check out _wrap_f

Re: [Mimedefang] md_syslog not working Mimedefang 2.71

>> Might be a stupid question, but anyway: are you sure that you have a syslog daemon installed. Not really a stupid question Kees, I hadn't checked that :-) I am using Wheezy and this is a clean new install and not an upgrade. Syslogd is a virtual package as far as I can tell from Aptitude. It'

[Mimedefang] adding a new attachment or duplicating the existing attachment

Hello all, Is there a way to add a new (additional) attachment to an email? Is there a way to duplicate an attachment and re-attach it to the same email? The original attachment (if present) would still be processed normally. Thanks, Michael smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sign

Re: [Mimedefang] Try to reject sender

On 4/23/2014 5:43 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote: Yes. I tried also with only quote and the messages still pass. :( Have you ever used the filter_sender and have you enabled it? For example, in /etc/sysconfig/mimedefang, change this: # If "yes", turn on the multiplexor sender checking function

Re: [Mimedefang] md_syslog not working Mimedefang 2.71

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Jon Rowlan wrote: >I am rather embarrassed to say that after years of using MD, I have >recently decided to bite the bullet and install a new Debian version and >update all the associated tools that I use and for the life of me I >cannot get md_syslog to work. Might be a stup

Re: [Mimedefang] Try to reject sender

Yes. I tried also with only quote and the messages still pass. :( Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Apr, 2014, at 5:59 pm, Matt Garretson > wrote: > >> On 4/23/2014 2:21 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote: >> Spammer Address: "www-data@test"@hotmail.com >> [...] >>if ($sender =~

Re: [Mimedefang] Try to reject sender

On 4/23/2014 2:21 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote: > Spammer Address: "www-data@test"@hotmail.com > [...] > if ($sender =~ /^?$/i) { You have an extra set of single quotes in your regex. ___ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other

[Mimedefang] Try to reject sender

Hi all, I´m trying to block some spammers but my rule is not working Spammer Address: "www-data@test"@hotmail.com Here is the rule. sub filter_sender { my ($sender, $ip, $hostname, $helo) = @_; if ($sender =~ /^?$/i) { return ('REJECT', "REJECT"); } re

[Mimedefang] md_syslog not working Mimedefang 2.71

I am rather embarrassed to say that after years of using MD, I have recently decided to bite the bullet and install a new Debian version and update all the associated tools that I use and for the life of me I cannot get md_syslog to work. I am not sure whether there are any tools to debug perl tha

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

Les wrote on 04/23/2014 12:29:40 PM: > That's ummm, interesting, that you can't see their example format > without a login. But it looks like they want to rewrite the > Reply-To: as the original sender which seems very wrong, at least for > technical lists where most posters would never want to

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, wrote: > >> So, is it time for mailing lists to rewrite the From: header? I've >> always preferred ones that supply a Reply-To: back to the list so >> people don't accidentally answer off-list anyway, but I know there are >> arguments on the other side. > > Tha

Re: [Mimedefang] DMARC pessimism (was Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list)

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: > > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> A standard for user interfaces??? What planet do you expect that to >> happen on? > > > > It makes a lot more sense than DMARC-- because it addresses the problem > Yahoo and AOL say they want to solve-- mail to

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

Les wrote on 04/23/2014 11:01:22 AM: > So, is it time for mailing lists to rewrite the From: header? I've > always preferred ones that supply a Reply-To: back to the list so > people don't accidentally answer off-list anyway, but I know there are > arguments on the other side. That seems to be

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

On 4/23/2014 10:32 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: "David F. Skoll" wrote: I regret to inform Yahoo users that they may no longer post to any mailing list hosted on lists.roaringpenguin.com. The madness has spread to AOL effective yesterday 4/22. host -t txt _dmarc.aol.com _dmarc.aol.com de

Re: [Mimedefang] DMARC pessimism (was Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list)

Les Mikesell wrote: A standard for user interfaces??? What planet do you expect that to happen on? It makes a lot more sense than DMARC-- because it addresses the problem Yahoo and AOL say they want to solve-- mail to their users that is faked. Systems with a web mail focus have total c

Re: [Mimedefang] DMARC pessimism (was Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list)

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:05:29 -0500 Les Mikesell wrote: > A standard for user interfaces??? What planet do you expect that to > happen on? which was more-or-less the response of the DMARC authors. I summarize it as: "The problem is too hard to fix correctly, so we will pretend to fix it in a h

Re: [Mimedefang] DMARC pessimism (was Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list)

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM, David F. Skoll wrote: >> These moves, by the way, will have the effect of rendering DMARC completely > useless. Mailing-list owners will change the From: header to > look something like: > > From: "pos...@yahoo.com" > > Users will see "pos...@yahoo.com" in their

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: > > The madness has spread to AOL effective yesterday 4/22. > >> host -t txt _dmarc.aol.com > > _dmarc.aol.com descriptive text "v=DMARC1\; p=reject\; pct=100\; > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com\; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com\;"; > So, is it t

[Mimedefang] DMARC pessimism (was Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list)

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:32:48 -0400 Joseph Brennan wrote: > The madness has spread to AOL effective yesterday 4/22. Ah well. The intersection of "AOL users" and "MIMEDefang members" is empty. This is not entirely unexpected. :) These moves, by the way, will have the effect of rendering DMARC c

Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Yahoo users may not post to this mailing list

"David F. Skoll" wrote: I regret to inform Yahoo users that they may no longer post to any mailing list hosted on lists.roaringpenguin.com. The madness has spread to AOL effective yesterday 4/22. host -t txt _dmarc.aol.com _dmarc.aol.com descriptive text "v=DMARC1\; p=reject\; pct=100\;