hi,
I have some little security question regarding mimedefang configuration as i
have issue running clamav and postfix with it because of socket owner's right.
Do you know if there is any security risk to run defang as the postfix user ?
Same question if i run mimedefang as the clamav user
hi,
I have some little security question regarding mimedefang configuration
as i have issue running clamav and postfix with it because of socket
owner's right.
Do you know if there is any security risk to run defang as the
postfix user ?
Same question if i run mimedefang as the clamav use
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
if there is a discclaimer that void this disclaimer it is a void
disclaimer and this disclaimer apply. muhahah :)
so happ
Enable it manually, put these line in your filter:
$Features{'Virus:CLAMAV'} = 0;# We have the daemon scanner
$Features{'Virus:CLAMD'} = 1;
If you look at mimedefang.pl, there is no real check for it.
Bye,
- -- Steffen Kaiser
i can't beleive it was so simple ! This works ! thanks
hello list,
following my postfix war ( need to change the init script to change the
owner of the socket of mimedefang to postfix and move the socket in the
postfix chroot...) I now try to make clamav working with mimedefang. The
issue is that it does not want to recognize it. I have put in my
After i filled the bug the package maintainer changer from recommand to
suggest:
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:31:12 +0100
Source: mimedefang
Binary: mimedefang graphdefang
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.67-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin
Changed-By: Christo
Richard Laager a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:30 +0100, ADNET Ghislain wrote:
i will try to contact him. I run also in another issue. Postfix runs as
the user posfix and i do not found any way to configure mimedefang to
have a socket that let the postfix user to communicate with it. Is
David F. Skoll a écrit :
ADNET Ghislain wrote:
strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly..
anyway it seems to work that way
Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing
MIMEDefang should never force the removal of Postfix.
i
ok i think i got it working by:
- installing mimedefang
- stopping sendmail
- purging sendmail
- installing postfix again
strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly..
anyway it seems to work that way
--
Cordialement,
Ghislain
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptog
hi,
I have a silly question. As i try to install mimedefang and postfix on
debian it seems debian want to install sendmail and remove postfix as
soon as i say the 'mimedefang' word. Is there any way to make this work
or are we doomed to sendmail on debian ?
The following NEW packages will
ADNET Ghislain a écrit :
hi,
is any of you able to make mimedefang work with axigen ? I have been
able to make the link between the two and discard messages based on
filter rules but i am unable to make rejection at the smtp level.
Anyone out there tried it out
hi,
is any of you able to make mimedefang work with axigen ? I have been
able to make the link between the two and discard messages based on
filter rules but i am unable to make rejection at the smtp level. Anyone
out there tried it out ?
--
Cordialement,
Ghislain
smime.p7s
Description:
Matt Garretson a écrit :
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Look in init.pre and uncomment the line. Make sure you also have the
required supporting modules.
Also, the OP might want to make sure $SALocalTestsOnly is set to 0.
ok thanks, so mimedefang read /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.pre i was
hello,
I was searching how you can specify to mimedefang the spamassassin
plugins to load. I saw that SPF checking was not done by mimedefang so
it seems that it does not load the plugins. I haven't seen in the man
pages which files mimedefang look for the plugins of spamassassin, any
idea ?
1) Less than 1% of the mail that slips through my defenses is spam.
None of it it viruses. If 80% of what hits someone's autoresponder is
spam, then they're idiots.
you know, lots of people are not properly educated, if you mean that. It
takes knowledge or/and money to filter this. Not e
80% of emails are spam and viruses with forged from adress. Having an
autoresponder is therefor asking for trouble. Auto responder were nice
in the 90's but in this world this is a real pain. Like the bounce those
are just making the problem worse. Emails cannot be used anymore like in
the old
just a little question, is anyone using nod32 on his server ? It seems
to receive some praise on the virus filtering world (or media should i
say). i wonder if this can be used with mimedefang.
It seems that nod32 is replacing procmail or mail on the MTA to filter
the emails.
Cordialement,
Ghisl
David F. Skoll wrote:
Mack wrote:
I'll repost this, as it may help
Based on the OP's article, I bet he's not using a RAM disk, which
will of course kill performance.
See http://www.mimedefang.org/kwiki/index.cgi?RamBasedSpoolDirectory
--
David.
__
Thanks Mikesell, i will answer offlist as this is less related to
mimedefang now.
best regards,
Ghislain.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.ro
What _are_ you looking at? RHEL4 (and thus Centos4) shipped with
Mysql 4.x eons ago; current versions are mysql-4.1.10a-2.RHEL4.1
and spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4.
the license i have are REHL3, if they have those version in REHL4 i
don't see what can prevent them to have the same version in RH
the RedHat source
RPMs with the trademarked name and artwork removed in a free
version: http://www.centos.org/. Support is provided by
rebuilding the RHEL update RPMs as quickly as possible and
either up2date or yum will pick them up from a distributed network
of mirror sites.
i use redhat fo
as taken from
man mimedefang-filter
(a good place to read lol)
we have so many little man page not very usefull compared to the website
that when i first opened the man page i wasn't beleiving what i saw in
there !
this is such an incredible man page, everything is in there with even
some
Hi,
I have some mail rejected by mimedefang but i cannot see why. I use it
in the default config file just to do clamav scanning and spamassassin
filtering and it works well (i have reject messages for spam and viruses
in the logs so all is fine). Nevertheless i have from time to time a :
45
>
> Agreed. I wouldn't be opposed to blocking port 25 if there were a way
> to get it unblocked for the clueful, like a web page that takes
> someone slightly more savvy than a monkey to navigate, and that you
> don't get free help to fill in. (Maybe require the user to solve a
> sendmail rule puz
Lisa Casey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to install Mimedefang on a FreeBSD 4.6 system as the Redhat
> system I was running my mail server on crashed. I've upgraded perl to
> 5.8.6 (it was 5.001 or something like that) and installed the
> necessary perl modules for mimedefang. I have a couple of questi
Yes, lots of them. :-)
There is a minor security problem with MD <= 2.49, and MIME::Tools
older than the current release could decode things incorrectly.
Note that if you upgrade MIME::Tools, you should also upgrade
MIME::Base64.
Regards,
David.
___
Visi
I just took a like at File::Scan, but their site does not list
FreeBSD as supported system; only Linux. :(
ClamAV, which I am now testing, works as advertised. But I read
you get a "ClamAV installation is OUTDATED" message whenever
the update program decides you need a newer version.
This will run
27 matches
Mail list logo
