On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI
> If someone dares to try it out...
compiling as I write...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerpla
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:10 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> But that's exactly the point, isn't it?
>
> That I'm pointing out to the ISP conclusively that the message
> came to me, via them... in the logs showing that the connection's
> remote end-point was X.X.X.X. They are saying "That's not
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 20:45 +0530, R.Linga Reddy wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Iam installing mimedefang while configuring the mimedefang i am
> facing below problem, it is stoping there while running the ./configure
> Please help me in this regard.
>
> Regards,
> Linga Reddy
You asked this question
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 10:37 -0600, Mike Campbell wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out what order the various filter_* routines are
> called during a session. I can find where filter_begin and filter_end
> are called but what about the order of the following:
>
> filter_relay
> filter_sender
> filte
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:24 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Actually, I have a better idea: If I completely remove filter_helo,
> will anyone morn its passing? Less code == better, and filter_helo
> is next to useless.
I won't miss it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 11:27 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As much as people complain about the oddities of Lotus Notes/Domino, the
> Out of Office agent will not cause a message storm on mailing lists. It
> only replies once to each recipient.
And won't send replies to internet addresses if
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 11:13 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Roedel, Mark wrote:
>
> > What would be the simplest way to specify -- either in Sendmail config
> > files, or in our existing MIMEDefang filter code -- that we want to
> > messages to certain (about a half-dozen or so) users redirected to
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:55 -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
> > Something else you can do to cut down on the problem is to make sure
> > Sendmail is set to reject messages with local senders that don't exist.
>
> We've discussed this, internally. We host the user mailboxes on internal
> Exchange ser
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 13:44 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I'm trying to optimize a server using MD and currently it does not run bind
> or cache lookups because the server must use a specific nameserver.
>
> In short, I don't know how to configure bind to always query another
> nameserver rat
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:06 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Dan Massey wrote:
>
> > Then 'makemap hash testfile < testfile' , so now I have a testdile.db as
> > well with one entry int as such:
>
> That's probably a Berkeley DB file, not a DBM file.
if you do 'file testfile' it will tell you wha
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 11:45 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
> Right you are. My statement was a little inaccurate in that if you don't use
> the MX, you aren't using DNS for the normal delivery to a domain. Maybe I'm
> misreading my maillog. My nsswitch.conf has "files, dns" in it, so it should
> b
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:52 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
> They are in /etc/hosts. Sendmail does not use /etc/hosts normally, I
> believe, and that is why an address in sendmail DBs need the square brackets
> around IPs, etc.
>
> Steve
Sendmail uses whatever address resolution mechanisms you ha
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 14:04 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> If anyone doesn't think SpamAssassin is an evil piece of code,
> _set_macro_LOCALSTATEDIR should
> remove all remaining doubts.
evil but useful???
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:20 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> So you need to do the checks in filter_sender, and filter_helo is essentially
> useless.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
Beat that dead horse, David!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:45 -0500, -ray wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Cormack, Ken wrote:
>
> > I run other SARE rulesets, updated w/ RDJ, but hadn't looked at that
> > ruleset.
>
> I would like to ask the list members who all uses SARE rulesets with RDJ.
> And which rule sets do you enable? I'
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:13 +0200, Christoph wrote:
> I use sendmail+mimedefang as a mailrelay between internal and external
> mailserver. I ve got a problem that some mails are not accepted by the
> internal mailserver:
> ( 501 Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL From:.
> 501 5.6.0 Dat
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:34 -0500, Cormack, Ken wrote:
> In the /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, I had enabled the following line 2
> days ago, and had forgotten...
>
> #loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
>
> After disabling that plugin again, my "uninitialized value" error
Jason Gurtz wrote:
I looked and this windows box doesn't have mim as a registered file type.
Seems like it isn't too big of a deal unless clients are using aol. I
guess if our policy dictated blocking .zip and other archives then I would
block this too.
My WinXP Pro machine at work has the f
David F. Skoll wrote:
> Would anyone on the list be interested in this? How much would you
pay? If I said $400/month, would you be appalled, or would you say
"Wow, that's cheap! Sign me up!" ?
I think it sounds like an interesting idea. Any idea how the bayes data
would work in highly te
e use MD as an integral part
of our 'compliance' toolkit for Sarbanes-Oxley. We also use it to
implement our internal compliance/corporate email policies.
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
___
Visit http://www.mimed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David F. Skoll wrote:
| On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Adam Lanier wrote:
|
|
|>Technically, a server can generate mail (legally according to RFC's)
|>without having an MX record. Only servers that RECEIVE mail need to
|>have an MX record.
|
|
| T
her a given relay server has both A and MX records. It may be
~ more appropriate to test whether a given server has both an A and a
PTR record that match and use this to modify the score for the message
although, again, in today's internet this isn't as likely to be setup
correctly
edefang, clmilter')dnl
Note that there is probably no benefit to doing this rather than just
removing the confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS entry unless you have a lot of
filters and simply want to redefine the order in which they are called.
- --
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
--
quickly. I regularly see
multiple updates during the course of the day.
- --
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBGmiUyiJGTGcJL0cRAi7yAJ95
pware' features
aren't very strong compared to other pre-existing packages, namely Lotus
/IBM Domino. I won't comment on whether/how much MS is threatened by this.
- --
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Li
().
> This forced a pause after the shutdown, and gave enough time for the sock
> file to be cleaned up, before the restart occured. Look at the times in
> your logfile to work out the needed pause duration.
This is exactly what I did also, seemed to solve the problem.
--
Adam Lanier
Be
Under what conditions is the following error generated:
Milter (mimedefang): local socket name
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock unsafe
I had thought (perhaps naively) that this was caused by incorrect
permissions on the socket. Are there other causes as well?
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L
1 defang defang 0 May 21 11:45 mimedefang.sock
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.c
Not sure if this is a solution or not at this point but someone suggested I check the
version of HTML::Parser. RedHat 8 ships with version 3.26 and latest version is 3.36.
Have upgraded and haven't seen the error again but it's still early yet...
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
"David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Adam Lanier wrote:
>
> > Apr 27 13:47:31 krusty mimedefang[27573]: mfconnect: Error
> > communicating with multiplexor
>
> Does the multiplexor pr
NOTIFIER feature,
assuming that I would see these errors in the output from the multiplexor and thus be
able to programmatically reqct to them but I see no such output. Should I be seeing
this type of output and, if so, what would it look like?
--
Adam
31 matches
Mail list logo
