Re: [Mimedefang] Problem scanning multiple attachments with Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Workstation 5.0.2.0

2004-04-21 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:29:04PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: Let's say you send a message with an attachment a.zip en b.zip and a.zip contains a virus and b.zip not. Calling aveclient with multiple files or in this case with a * returns only the scan return code of the last MIME part

Re: [Mimedefang] MD 2.42 find wrong version of kaspersky 5

2004-04-21 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:19:55AM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote: In your filter, set: $Features{'Virus:AVP'} = 0; and MD will no longer use kavscanner. thanks david, but that is not my point. my point is that MD should not take kavscanner as a virus scanner during MD installation if

Re: [Mimedefang] Problem scanning multiple attachments with Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Workstation 5.0.2.0

2004-04-21 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:29:04PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Ernst-Paul ten Brinke wrote: Let's say you send a message with an attachment a.zip en b.zip and a.zip contains a virus and b.zip not. Calling aveclient with multiple files or in this case with a *

Re: Re: [Mimedefang] Replacing SpamAssassin with DSPAM

2004-04-02 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:28:41PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: Would you want to build support for it into MD? If someone has a working filter that integrates DSPAM, I'll happily add support for it. I think SA 3.0 will have plugin for DSPAM or CRM114, look this bugzilla

Re: [Mimedefang] Quoted material

2004-03-17 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:22:11PM -0600, Aaron Paetznick wrote: : : I suggest increasing the quoted material limit for this list. I : understand the need for such a feature, but the benefit versus : inconvenience ratio is too low IMHO. : : : --Aaron yes I agree with you :) cahya

Re: [Mimedefang] greylisting in filter_end after SA check?

2004-03-16 Thread Cahya Wirawan
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:07:35PM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote: You are in a sense implementing a floating blacklist with this policy. The reason greylist has a short delay is so it is not noticed, with your longer policy you will delay legitimate email. the original paper about greylisting uses

[Mimedefang] greylisting in filter_end after SA check?

2004-03-15 Thread Cahya Wirawan
Currently I use greylisting in filter_begin with 4 minutes block time, it works fine and reduce most of the spams. But there are still few spams slip through with the score between 3 and 6 (my score threshold is 6) . My idea is to reply the sender a temporary failure message if the score is

[Mimedefang] Greylisting problem with the default confTO_COMMAND

2004-02-26 Thread Cahya Wirawan
Hi, I have implemented greylisting in filter_begin, it works great, but there is still an issue because there are some spam software that keep the connection open after they get temporary failure message. The sendmail default timeout to wait a command (confTO_COMMAND) is 1 hour, so if I set the