David F. Skoll wrote:
[snip]
>
> Well! :-) We have an arms race, then. I'll change my disclaimer
> to read "This disclaimer supersedes all other disclaimers, even if
> the other disclaimers claim otherwise. This is a NUCLEAR POWERED
> disclaimer that will ATOMIZE all other disclaimers. This dis
Boggle.
http://www.kurai.org/~gdunn/ascii-spam.png
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
Ole Craig wrote:
Pray tell, what is this "DCMA" of which you write? Is it by
any chance related to that execrable legislation known as the "Digital
Millenium Copyright Act"? (Which the observant reader will note is
acronymised as "DMCA"...)
Ole, whose pets are feeling peevish
Sure, sum
Ian Mitchell wrote:
FBI NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is protected
by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA). The author(s) of this
email have spent a considerable amount of time in thoughtful construction
of the contents of the messages and as such, if you are not th
David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Graham Dunn wrote:
Is there an easy way to check what parameters are being passed?
I doubt that it's a problem in the rc file, but I'd like to rule that
out ...
Why not edit the rc file and hard-code a -k option in? Then you'll kn
Stephane Lentz wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:31:14AM -0500, Graham Dunn wrote:
I'm in the midst of trying to debug a clamd zip failure
Dec 9 09:26:36 ureshii mimedefang.pl[73455]: iB9EQaSe031074: Clamd
returned error:
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mdefang-iB9EQaSe031074/Work/msg-73455-35
I'm in the midst of trying to debug a clamd zip failure
Dec 9 09:26:36 ureshii mimedefang.pl[73455]: iB9EQaSe031074: Clamd
returned error:
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mdefang-iB9EQaSe031074/Work/msg-73455-357.zip: Zip
module failure
and have enabled
KEEP_FAILED_DIRECTORIES=yes
in rc.d/mimdefang.sh
h
heck out milter-greylist, (this can be done in mimedefang, but it's a
much more lightweight as a milter). Or any other greylist solution, for
that matter.
It's working quite well. I think there are still some issues that you
hit if you're greylisting millions of entries, but f
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:42 AM -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reminds me of the old online gaming joke. "Hey everybody, press Alt-F4
to activate (insert cool weapon name)"... then laugh as you see the
"(player) disconnected" messages start to come in...
A surprisi
Paul Murphy wrote:
Jan-Pieter,
On my system, your message shows a header which contains:
X-message-flag: *** MICROSOFT OUTLOOK FATAL ERROR 15: PRESS ALT+F4 TO CONTINUE
This also appears in yellow in the Outlook session as a header section to the
message viewer - is this part of your message, or som
Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
"MB" == Marco Berizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> I'm running MD 2.45 with SpamAssassin 3 and uribl test are not
MB> working. My filter has SALocalTestOnly = 1 I have followed this
MB> message
Make sure you have the Net::DNS perl module installed and tested.
I've run int
Marco Berizzi wrote:
I'm running MD 2.45 with SpamAssassin 3 and uribl test are not
working. My filter has SALocalTestOnly = 1
I have followed this message
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-August/023947.html
and I commented out all tflags entry in
/usr/share/spamassassin/25
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:02:43AM -0400, Graham Dunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:04:40PM -0700, Nathan Martinez wrote:
> > > Is there somethine else I should be doing to troubleshoot?
> > >
> >
> > I had a very similar problem and running 'spamass
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:04:40PM -0700, Nathan Martinez wrote:
> > Is there somethine else I should be doing to troubleshoot?
> >
>
> I had a very similar problem and running 'spamassassin -D --lint' showed
> me that my Net::DNS perl module was out of date. Once I upgraded
> Net::DNS, everythi
I'm stumped.
Just to get past the usual (at least as far as the archives go):
In mimdefang-filter:
$SALocalTestsOnly = 0;
In spamassassin/sa-mimdefang.cf:
skip_rbl_checks 0
uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+2')
describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's doma
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:26:26AM -0400, Graham Dunn wrote:
>
> http://pochacco.dnsalias.net/~gdunn/extract-exchange-55-20040810.tar.gz
>
Forgot to add that you'll need to add whatever you have in @mx_domains
to your "relay-dom
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:44:43AM -0500, Damrose, Mark wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lucas Albers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I tried to get read the ldap address book entries from my internal
> > exchange server (5.5) but I could never get it to work.
> > I couldn't justify
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:17:41PM -0400, Jeff Rife wrote:
> On 9 Aug 2004 at 21:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > > If the receiving MX servers always knew all valid recipient addresses
> > > *at (E)SMTP connection time*, then there would be no bounces...only
> > > rejections.
> > >
> > > This so
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:37:13PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Graham Dunn wrote:
>
> > OK, even with this in there, I'm still hitting the code that checks for
> > bad zips.
>
> [...]
>
> > return 1 if (re_match($entity, $re));
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:17:23PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Graham Dunn wrote:
>
> > $secret = '^itc*\.zip$';
>
> That regexp will match:
>
> it.zip
> itc.zip
> itcc.zip
> itccc.zip
> etc..
>
> You almost c
I'm trying to do something which should be simple, and yet still escapes
me.
Why won't (in filter_bad_filename()):
# Attachments matching this regexp will go through
$secret = '^itc*\.zip$';
return 0 if (re_match($entity, $secret));
return 0 on a filename of itcfoo.zip ?
The line (
Just started using the embedded perl option and I've seen this a couple
times over the last hour or so (different slaves).
mimedefang-2.42 from ports, freebsd 4.8-stable, perl 5.6.1 (also from
ports)
There don't seem to be any negative consequences of this (mail is still
humming along fine).
Is
We send and receive a fair amount of .zip file containing file types in
the $bad_exts category. As such, I'm trying to come up with a simple
method to allow certain zip files through, while excluding the nasty
ones.
The first shot I've taken at this is getting people to add a prefix onto
their zip
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:49:01PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> ** Reply to note from Kelson Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:33:25
> -0800
>
>
> > >mimedefang-multiplexor: Slave 12 stderr: razor2 check skipped: Bad file
> > >descriptor Died at
> > >/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:07:24PM +0800, cc wrote:
> Graham Dunn sighed and wrote::
>
> > This started happening this afternoon, after I changed
> > mimedefang-filter. When the slaves started dying, I reverted my changes,
> > and restarted, but the problem persisted. I&#
This started happening this afternoon, after I changed
mimedefang-filter. When the slaves started dying, I reverted my changes,
and restarted, but the problem persisted. I've tried running with the
stock suggested-minimum-filter-for-windows-clients filter, same problem.
The multiplexor will start
mav/clamd.log
PidFile /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid
LocalSocket /var/spool/MIMEDefang/clamd.sock
FixStaleSocket
StreamSaveToDisk
MaxDirectoryRecursion 15
User mailnull
ScanMail
ScanArchive
ArchiveMaxFileSize 10M
ArchiveMaxRecursion 5
ArchiveMaxFiles 1000
The *-zippwd viruses were not getting caught until I added
I vaguely remember some mention that this version supported scanning
using multiple engines, rather than the "first found" approach.
Is this the case or am I sadly confused?
Thanks,
Graham
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIM
?
Thanks,
Graham
--
Graham Dunn, IT Manager
Inscriber Technology, 26 Peppler St, Waterloo, ON, CA N2J3C4
519 570 9111 x243
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com
Does anyone have mimedefang-filter code to drop the "you sent us a
virus" messages from the less clueful anti-virus engines? (Or point to
the archives ...)
Thanks,
Graham
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing li
30 matches
Mail list logo
