Hi List,
I upgraded to MD 2.68 (from 2.61, I missed a few!).
After checking the Changelog for incompatibilities, I thought it should
be a smooth upgrade.
However, after installing and firing it up, I kept receiving the error:
all slaves are busy, and then;
Slave 5 stderr: panic: top_env
Slave 5
Thanks for all that replied.
David - I had forgotten to included that I had googled, I just didn't
like the response I got (perl bug).
I don't believe the bug is in my filter (or only in my filter), as
replacing the filter with the stock suggested minimum for windows..
included filter gave the
And David F. Skoll spoke unto them and said:
embperl.c:21: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
...
The warning is harmless, though.
Thanks David, I wasn't sure if it had completed the 'make' or not, as it
didn't seem to take very long.
Without wanting to delve too deeply into
Hi all,
I'm currently running Mimedefang v2.51 on a Red Hat 9 system, with Perl
v5.8.0 without issue.
Today, I decided it was time to upgrade MD to the latest version, as it's
been a while between drinks.
The process so far involved upgrading MIME::Tools from 5.415 to 5.420 which
went well (with
Greetings List,
Was just forwarded this link by an anti-spam product cold caller:
http://www.send-safe.com/screenshots.php
I found it interesting that this particular product ships with SpamAssassin
built-in to test messages against a default ruleset of SA.
I thought others might find it
David + list,
Just like to add my $0.02AU (I know, not very much indeed!).
I'm currently using File::Scan on three MD installations, and have not had a
reported false positive, but as the majority of respondants have said, I
don't monitor closely exactly _what_ is getting rejected due to virii
Howdy all,
After upgrading to MD2.48 on a RedHat box, when running `service
mimedefang status`, it is returning the following message:
mimedefang (pid 27896) is running...
mimedefang-multiplexor dead but pid file exists
I have verified that both of the .pid files are being created in /var/run
and
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:29:19 -0500, Yang Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the mimedefang-multiplexor.sock in /var/spool/MIMEDefang/ dir?
or check where ever you configured the socket to be in.
Yes, both .sock files are there which is why MimeDefang runs and still
processes mail.
I believe the
Nathan Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would give URIDNSBL a try, but I can't seem to get its rules to run. I
have $SALocalTestsOnly = 0 in my mimedefang-filter.
Hi Nathan,
Having just enabled this feature myself (MD v2.41/2.38 + SA 2.63), and
experienced the frustration when it didn't
On Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:15:45 -0400, Mark Penkower [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I then need to recompile MimeDefang (2.39) to recognize the scanner.
After
running .configure, I get:
MD 2.39 is a little old now, I suggest upgrading to 2.44 if for no other
reason than because you can ;) Also,
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:53:18 +0200, The Searcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mimedefang starts without any problems, but when a mail arrives in the
queue it's not processed by the milter and the syslog reports folowing:
MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
0x1f does not fulfill action
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:10:48 -0600, Eric Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Hi ;)
I sure hope you can help me out I'm lost on what to try next here.
I hope so too. One thing I noticed:
and it creates the /var/spool/mimedefang.sock
in your .mc files you've got
From: Nathan Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or 6 slaves that are busy. I guess my question is why is my load so
high if I am only processing 5 or 6 mails at a time?
[...Snip...]
1. /var/spool/MIMEDefang is on a RAM Disk
2. I am using the Perl interpreter
3. Only messages smaller than 100KB are
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:23:29 -0500, Minica, Nelson \(EDS\) commented:
I also have this problem if I try to restart MD before the previous MD
processes have stopped. Log file for example you can see it is trying
to start before mi_stop=1... Something wrong with init.d script.
I have had
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:22:32 -0700, Matthew Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] remarked:
I was just wondering if anyone had a script that broke out spam and virus
detection on a per user basis.
I've been using mailstats.pl to get overall users their own personal stats.
Not sure if this is exactly what you
15 matches
Mail list logo
