>
> Actually, the filter does not correspond to your description.
> You reject hosts, that use a HELO argument that ends in your
> domain, but
> are not one of the listed hosts. So this filter_sender() let pass
> the mail correctly.
> No sender check is made.
>
> BTW: The terms From: and To:
>
> > return(0, "Go away. $hostip is not a mydomain.com
> > machine");
>
> Should be:
>
>return('REJECT', "Go away...")
>
> > return (1, "OK");
>
> Should be:
>
>return('CONTINUE', "OK");
>
Thanks for the reply David. Can we have this page updated
to refl
Howdy,
I'm still having random problems with filter_sender.
It seems it isn't invoked all the time. Following the
advice from other threads I saw, I modified my filter
(below) to reject everything. That seemed to work fine
so I was convinced my filter was running. However, some
mail addressed T
We send out a bi-weekly newsletter and are always getting bounces. Is it
possible to make mimedefang programmatically grab these bounces, extract
their names from the bounce, and flag/update the db so we know to
investigate?
Or does anyone have any better solutions?
Thanks,
Scott
___
I'm getting ready to embark on tweaking MD to handle multiple domains
differently. Specifically, I don't want MD to process SpamAssassin or
ClamAV at all for a particular domain (I know, I know, but it isn't my
domain, I'm just doing what the customer wants). My question is, are there
any changes
>
> > I know there's probably ways to do this.. I'd just have to sit down
> > and do it.. but don't have the time...
> >
> > But don't you guys and gals get mad when you see some
> pathetic loser
> > try and bash the doors down to your mail server??
> >
> Yeah, just want to route them out
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Brad Tarver
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mimedefang] Not sure if MD is using clamd
>
> I have a sendmail box acting as a gateway for 2 Exchange
et the timing for this from mimedefang?
> Scott Harris said:
>
-T option to mimedefang, such as:
/usr/local/bin/mimedefang -T -k -U defang -m
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang-multiplexor.sock -p /var/spool/MIMEDef
ang/mimedefang.sock &
-T Causes mimedefang to log
> > > --
> >
> > I'm tempted to take the same route, except for the fact
> that I noticed
> > the filter time has gone up dramatically:
>
> Scott -
> The problem I had seemed to be that MD wasn't actually
> talking to clamd. (Do you catch the EICAR text file with
> clamd enabled?) It w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Roedel, Mark
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] Problem running clamd but not clamscan
>
>
> Has clamd been restarted (or otherwise f
> Scott, et al -
> I had similar issues with clamd versus clamscan (see
> lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2003-December/01
> 8671.html)
> but nobody else seemed to (or at least, nobody responded) and
> I gave up due to lack of time. (Figuring, "I've got a
> solution that work
I've been debugging why I've not been catching the
new worm going around for the last day. This morning
I finally received a new message that passed through
my new configuration and was finally caught. What I
had to do in order to get it to scan is alter
mimedefang-filter and change the orde
12 matches
Mail list logo
