Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> > Changelog relative to 2.39 follows.
>
> Doh!!! I forgot to include this in the changelog:
>
> * mimedefang.pl.in (re_match_in_zip_directory): Added function
> to look inside zip archives
Quoting Josh Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I realize this is a bit OT, but I've seen SBL recommended here before,
> and I'm not sure where else to ask...
>
> I'm trying to reconfigure our mail server to start blocking spam instead
> of tagging it with SpamAssassin and trusting our users to set up
Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I can do that, but I don't think DFS wil be happy with this.
>
> MIMEDefang was released under the GPL; I accepted the risk that someone
> would create an open-source CanIt workalike.
>
Quoting Jonas Eckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:36:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > is to develop the system and sell the services to install
>
> > This is not a distribution, but a regular installation and support
> > of the system, based on open source softw
Quoting "Kevin A. McGrail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I think you misunderstood my idea about that system. The system is not
> going to
> > be distributed as a software!!! That system is just a combination of open
> > source software with web interface. And the code in not going to be
> > proprietar
Quoting "Kevin A. McGrail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Are you certain that this does not vialoate the licenses for any of the
> software you are using?
>
> I didn't want to get into this on the list because I thought it was an
> affront to CanIT, however, I concur that modifying these packages and
Quoting Jonas Eckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:28:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > is to develop the system and sell the services to install and
> > maintain the system, we are not going to sell the software and the
> > project is not going to be an Open Source on
Hello,
My Name is Dmitry Sorokin. I work for Intellinet Technologies Inc., an IT
consulting company located in the Edmonton Reasearch Park (Alberta, Canada).
We are currently developing Advanced Email System with web based management
interface, which is based on FreeBSD, Sendmail, Cyrus IMAPD,
Quoting Ole Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 01/28/04 at 08:32, 'twas brillig and Scott Harris scrobe:
> > Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] Problem running clamd but not clamscan
> >
> >
> > > Scott, et al -
> > > I had similar issues with clamd versus clamscan (see
> > > lists.roaringpenguin.com/piperm
Quoting Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying this change now to see if it really makes a difference. But
> shouldn't clamav be unzipping by default?
>
It does it by default, but I don't think it does that properly with damaged zip
archives. That was the reason I had to switch from us
Quoting Mail Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> David F. Skoll wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Add the --mime switch to detect MIME encoded virus's.
> >
> >
> > I'm planning on a 2.40 release soon. Would all virus-scanner owners please
> > review how MD
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Make sure you have the settings on to scan through zip files, and you
> > are running freshclam frequently.
>
> I'm running the current stable version of ClamAV (0.65) and have
> freshclam checking for updates several time
Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [action_notify_sender is locked out if a virus is detected...]
>
> > What about if I don't want to bounce the message, but just drop the
> infected
> > file + notify sender (only if it's local sender
Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, James Ralston wrote:
>
> > David Skoll:
> > > ... if any *_contains_virus function says there's a
> > > virus, the action_notify_sender routine will fail with a nasty log
> > > message.
>
> > That strikes be as being perfectly
Quoting Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > But I have another question (similar to first one):
> > Does it make sense to reject email if domain part of sender's address
> > doesn't have A or MX records?
>
> Sendmail temp fails that now.
>
I'm sure it rejects it by default (at least the
Quoting Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --On Friday, January 16, 2004 09:26 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What do you think folks, is that a good idea to reject emails from relays
> > with no PTR record?
>
>
> No. Some legit mail comes that way. But giving it S
Hi,
What do you think folks, is that a good idea to reject emails from relays with
no PTR record?
Thanks,
Dmitry
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mail
17 matches
Mail list logo
